<html><body>
<DIV>Colin,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>In order of lightest load to heaviest load -</DIV>
<DIV>15x11x4</DIV>
<DIV>18x10 (wide chord at hub, narrow at tip)</DIV>
<DIV>15.75x10x3</DIV>
<DIV>18x10PN</DIV>
<DIV>18.1x10.1</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The 3 blade and 18.1 are the quietest props and have the best braking. The 15x11x4 has the least amount of thrust/vertical.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Regards,</DIV>
<DIV><BR>DL</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">-------------- Original message -------------- <BR>From: colin chariandy <cchariandy@yahoo.ca> <BR>
<DIV>All/OS users</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I'm still looking for the best compramise for speed control using the OS140/Aeroslave pipe and an "almost" wide body aircraft like the Temptation. Has anyone tried the new 18.1x10.1? How does it compare to the 18x10, 18x10pn, DL re-pitched 3 blades and the old 4 blades?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I would like to try a new (currently using 15x11x4) approach but would prefer not to buy 3 new props. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Colin.</DIV>
<P>
<HR SIZE=1>
<A href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=40705/*http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca"><B>All new Yahoo! Mail </B></A>
<HR SIZE=1>
Get news delivered. Enjoy RSS feeds right on your Mail page. </BLOCKQUOTE></body></html>