<DIV style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;"><DIV>The 170's I have seen are using 3 or 4 blade props to keep the noise down and still have to be throttled back on the vertical knife-edge stuff.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Randy<BR><BR>--- vicenterc@comcast.net wrote:<BR><BR>From: vicenterc@comcast.net<BR>To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>, NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><BR>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] New YS ???<BR>Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:39:16 +0000<BR><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Good point Mike. Thanks,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Vicente "Vince" Bortone.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">-------------- Original message -------------- <BR>From: mike mueller <mups1953@yahoo.com> <BR> Vince the 160 vs the 140DZ allows a lot more options for running bigger props. Thats what I like about the 160. I can only hope that the 170's will handle the big props even better. Mike<BR><BR><B><I>vicenterc@comcast.net</I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">
<DIV>I have the following questions:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>1. Do we really need more power than the YS 160 DZ for pattern? Please don't tell me that "more power is always better". I know that one. Probably, it is required for some F3A maneuvers and I don't know because I don't fly F3A.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>2. Is the YS 170 a complete new redesign? If not, I assume that YS is using the same components of the YS 160 DZ. If that is the case, I will wonder how the same mechanical parts are going to take the additional forces of the more powerful engine. I am sure that YS have been doing research and testing.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Regards,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Vicente "Vince" Bortone</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">-------------- Original message -------------- <BR>From: adriancwong@earthlink.net <BR><BR>> 170 should start production in early 07. YS is trying to finish fulfilling the <BR>> back orders of the 160. <BR>> <BR>> Believe me, the motor is powerful, even more so than the 160. I've seen two of <BR>> them ran at a contest two weeks ago, scary power. <BR>> <BR>> Adrian <BR>> <BR>> -----Original Message----- <BR>> >From: Adam Glatt <BR>> >Sent: Aug 13, 2006 6:18 PM <BR>> >To: NSRCA Mailing List <BR>> >Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] New YS ??? <BR>> > <BR>> >As an electric guy who has seen the YS 170 in two big competitions now <BR>> >(France WC and 06 Muncie), I believe the 170 can be used to fly pattern <BR>> >just as well as any electric motor. The pattern will lo! ! ok a li ttle <BR>> >different, of course, but it can be just as good or better: see Onda and <BR>> >CPLR. <BR>> >-Adam <BR>> > <BR>> >Koenig, Tom wrote: <BR>> >> Hello again Pattern world, <BR>> >> <BR>> >> Since everyone is talking about electric power these days-I thought <BR>> >> I'd throw out this question. <BR>> >> <BR>> >> Is there a new YS being planned that anyone knows of or is testing? Troy? <BR>> >> <BR>> >> I don't believe the 170 is slated for release, nor do I believe this <BR>> >> will be an adequate 'competitor' for the current generation of 'E' <BR>> >> power plants. I would have thought Yamada San would need to work on <BR>> >> something that would blow our socks off. The OS 200 4 stroke is <BR>> >> supposed to be on its way-but so is Christmas!! <BR>> >> <BR>> >> Anyone in the know? <BR>> >> <BR>&gt! ; & ! gt;> Tom <BR>> >> ************************************************************************ <BR>> >> *PLEASE NOTE* This email and any attachments may <BR>> >> be confidential. If received in error, please delete all <BR>> >> copies and advise the sender. The reproduction or <BR>> >> dissemination of this email or its attachments is <BR>> >> prohibited without the consent of the sender. <BR>> >> <BR>> >> WARNING RE VIRUSES: Our computer systems sweep <BR>> >> outgoing email to guard against viruses, but no warranty <BR>> >> is given that this email or its attachments are virus free. <BR>> >> Before opening or using attachments, please check for <BR>> >> viruses. Our liability is limited to the re-supply of any <BR>> >> affected attachments. <BR>> >> <BR>> >> Any views expressed in this message are those of the <BR>> >> individual ! sender, e! xcept w here the sender expressly, <BR>> >> and with authority, states them to be the views of the <BR>> >> organisation. <BR>> >> ************************************************************************ <BR>> >> <BR>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ <BR>> >> <BR>> >> _______________________________________________ <BR>> >> NSRCA-discussion mailing list <BR>> >> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org <BR>> >> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion <BR>> >> <BR>> >_______________________________________________ <BR>> >NSRCA-discussion mailing list <BR>> >NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org <BR>> >http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion <BR>> <BR>> _______________________________________________ <BR>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list <BR>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org <B>> http:! //lists .nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion </B></BLOCKQUOTE>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<DIV></DIV>
<HR size="1">
Do you Yahoo!?<BR>Get on board. <A href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=40791/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/handraisers">You're invited</A> to try the new Yahoo! Mail Beta. </BLOCKQUOTE>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</DIV>