<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff"
bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><SPAN class=470391817-09072006> Easy. Elevator, rudder, aileron. In
that order. Works in both directions (left AND right). It even works
inverted but you apply opposite aileron / rudder. The whole thing takes about 1
second. That's the problem. Your eyes are "blind" when they're moving. That's
another problem. How much of it do we really see?</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=470391817-09072006> Here's something to think about. Have
you ever looked at an LED display - like an alarm clock or something like that.
Does it look like the LEDs are "On" constantly? They're not. OK, in some designs
they are but most of the time they are multiplexed. There are 7 segments in a
display. The number "8" requires all of them to be illuminated at the same time.
The micro that drives them does not turn each one on at the same time. It turns
each one on for a certain period of time, then the next one, then the next one.
In spite of this, your eyes "see" them all on at the same time. This is due to
the persistence of the display and the fact that your eyes and brain aren't as
fast as you think they are. Now for some fun. Eat some D'Oritos (or any hard
crunchy food - this makes your eyes "blind" for a short period of time) and look
at the same display. See what I mean? The same is true for a
CRT display (the one on your PC). If the refresh rate is low enough, you'll
see some weird stuff if you eat D'Oritos and look at the display. </SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=470391817-09072006></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=470391817-09072006>
<P><FONT size=2>John Pavlick<BR><A href="http://www.idseng.com/"
target=_blank>http://www.idseng.com</A><BR> </FONT> </P></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]<B>On Behalf Of </B>R.
LIPRIE<BR><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, July 08, 2006 11:48 PM<BR><B>To:</B> NSRCA
Mailing List<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion]
Snaps<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV>Nat,'</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> I agree with
what you said, all the way. And it actually helped me understand a little bit
more. About the substance of snap rolls. But there still is a very big
controversy over the (millions of ways) to do a snap roll. But maybe one day
everybody will agree on one particular way.</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>