<html><body>
<DIV>Not specified is not specifiied.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I believe the prior discussion was with respect to when the text did not include the same level of detail as the aresti figure. I believe the verdict was that the text was the priority, and the aresti was an example of the manuever, but not necessarily the only variant possible.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I think Don R previously made this clarification (of course I could be hallucinating as well).</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Dave</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">-------------- Original message -------------- <BR>From: Ed White <edvwhite@sbcglobal.net> <BR>Didn't we go through this in P03 on some maneuver where somewhere in the code it said that if roll direction wasn't specified, and there were two same kind of rolls in one maneuver, that the rolls had to be done in opposite directions.<BR><BR>Or am I hallucinating again?<BR><BR>Ed<BR><BR><B><I>DaveL322@comcast.net</I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid">
<DIV><A href="http://www.fai.org/aeromodelling/documents/sc4">http://www.fai.org/aeromodelling/documents/sc4</A></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Roll direction is not specified - but it must cover 90 degrees of looping (1/8 of prior loop and 1/8 of following loop) with 90 degrees of roll completed at the tangent point between loops.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Dave</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid">-------------- Original message -------------- <BR>From: mike mueller <mups1953@yahoo.com> <BR> Where's the actual rules book? Also on the Horizontal Eight with intergrated 1/2 rolls does the rolling direction have to be the same on each half? TIA, Mike
<DIV> </DIV>
<HR SIZE=1>
Sneak preview the <A href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=40762/*http://www.yahoo.com/preview">all-new Yahoo.com</A>. It's not radically different. Just radically better. </BLOCKQUOTE>From: mike mueller <mups1953@yahoo.com><BR>To: nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] P-07 question<BR>Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:33:50 +0000<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BLOCKQUOTE><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></body></html>