<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Thanks Earl.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Eric.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=ehaury@houston.rr.com href="mailto:ehaury@houston.rr.com">Earl
Haury</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA Mailing List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, April 02, 2006 8:12
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] USA team
trials</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Eric</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>OK :)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>There's no particular standard - essentially the
TS format at the Nats has been the same as the Nats (with
the noted changes in the finals) so as to not inconvenience the Nats only
participants. The format for this year's Nats actually fits the F3A WC format
pretty well - so it's kool for the TS without change.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Earl</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=pattern4u@comcast.net href="mailto:pattern4u@comcast.net">Grow
Pattern</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA Mailing List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, April 02, 2006 5:48
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] USA
team trials</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Earl,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> I
didn't say it was inappropriate. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>In my exposure to team trials at the Nat's I
have not see the formula used where there was, </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>4 matrixed P-07's, </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>2 semi-final rounds for 20 pilots of F-07,
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>and then a 4 round final (2 F's and 2
unknowns). </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I have seen a 6-round matrix-qualifier and
then a 4-round final (2 F's and 2 unknowns). </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>So I thought that something might have to
change???</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Is there a standard for team trails, or is it
flexible?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Regards,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Eric.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=ehaury@houston.rr.com href="mailto:ehaury@houston.rr.com">Earl
Haury</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA Mailing List</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, April 02, 2006 9:03
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] USA
team trials</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Eric</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I'm going to need some help to understand
your views. You state:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>" In the last printed format for the
2006 Nationals FAI class was <BR>being run as follows. P-07 on Monday and
Tuesday,Semi's on Wednesday flying <BR>F-07, and then Final's on Thursday
with two F-07's and two different <BR>unknowns. To run a team trials this
would have to be changed."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Given that this format was adopted by the
NSRCA to make F3A at our Nats compliant with FAI
rules - how is it inappropriate for selecting the Team? What
changes are deemed necessary?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Please understand also that the AMA
"Procedures Governing the Academy's Sponsorship of FAI Teams" specifies
(pg.9 sec IV item 5) "The only applicable rules for team selection
contests are the AMA By-Laws and standing rules, the <STRONG>approved
program details </STRONG>(emphasis mine), the current FAI Sporting
Code, and this document." The key in this discussion is "the approved
program details". (The program is prepared by the TSC and approved
by Program participants.) This has been done and the "detail" is that
they will be conducted within the framework of the Nats (as previously
defined by the NSRCA process) as published.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>FWIW - I've as the AMA Competitions Dept. to
publish the above referenced document (Amended Nov. 2005) on their
website, and they plan to do so - but they sure are slow about
it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Your other points are easier to understand.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The "extra judges" who are paid to come in
are primarily to ensure an adequate number of qualified judges. (We've all
been involved at scrambling to find warm bodies for the judges seats in
the finals.) There is an opportunity for the appearance of
"stacking the judges" in someone's favor. I have suggested that any
"hired" judges be currently involved with pattern competition, known as
qualified, and be certified by the NSRCA program.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The effect of the unknowns selection process
on scheduling (banquet, etc.) is certainly real. However - F3A is AMA
Class 406 and, as such, should be embraced as a very real component of
what pattern is by the Society and the rules accommodated. (I would also
like to see more Society activity within the F3A rules process - but
that's another topic.)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>As the Team Selections <STRONG><U>are
</U></STRONG>the Nats, there should be no favoritism or extra / hidden
agenda that influences decisions that could disadvantage any class
relative to another. Understand - there is a Nats Event Director and a
Nats CD, there is not also a Team Selection CD. Neither the Team Selection
Committee, it's Chairman, or anyone else in the US F3A loop have any say
at a TS when the contest has started, and certainly not at the
Nats. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>So - again - it's the intent and definition
of the TSC to select the 2007 F3A US Team at the 2006 Nats using the
process previously defined for the Nats, it should be transparent. I
also understand that there are concerns that have come
from experience, open communication is the best method of
addressing these.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Earl</FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><FONT size=2></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>----- Original Message ----- </FONT>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>From: "Grow Pattern" <</FONT><A
href="mailto:pattern4u@comcast.net"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>pattern4u@comcast.net</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial
size=2>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <</FONT><A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial
size=2>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 11:38
PM</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] USA team
trials</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><BR><FONT size=2></FONT></FONT></DIV><FONT
face=Arial size=2>>
Earl,<BR>> In the
last printed format for the 2006 Nationals FAI class was <BR>> being
run as follows. P-07 on Monday and Tuesday,Semi's on Wednesday flying
<BR>> F-07, and then Final's on Thursday with two F-07's and two
different <BR>> unknowns. To run a team trials this would have to be
changed.<BR>> <BR>> So I agree with Ron's concern about changing
things, (someone get Ron some <BR>> smelling salts quick!), just
for FAI team selection needs. I have seen a <BR>> lot of that over the
years. A team trials has a marked effect upon judge <BR>> selection and
the payment of the extra judges who come in for the FAI <BR>> selection
component. It already has spilled over into the social side of the
<BR>> Nat's where our banquet is now on a Tuesday night so that FAI
unknown <BR>> schedules can be drawn up on the Wednesday night.<BR>>
<BR>> It also puts a lot onto the Nat's event director and invariably
the other <BR>> classes experience some neglect. I also wonder if it
wise to have the same <BR>> guy running the Nat's and the team trials,
especially when the some of the <BR>> top FAI pilots are sponsored
directly of indirectly by the same individual.<BR>> <BR>> I would be
much happier if the FAI team selection was not run by the AMA <BR>>
Nat's event director. I would also like to keep the Nat's for the majority
<BR>> who come for the participation.<BR>> <BR>> Regards,<BR>>
<BR>> Eric.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> ----- Original
Message ----- <BR>> From: "Earl Haury" <</FONT><A
href="mailto:ehaury@houston.rr.com"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>ehaury@houston.rr.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial
size=2>><BR>> To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <</FONT><A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial
size=2>><BR>> Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 5:14 PM<BR>>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] USA team trials<BR>> <BR>>
<BR>>> Ron<BR>>><BR>>> There is no proposal to change
the Nats format for the TS. There is an<BR>>> additional fee for
participation in the program and finals judges are <BR>>>
being<BR>>> recruited beforehand. This excerpt from the program
should cover concerns<BR>>> about the event.<BR>>> "Event
Qualification. The US Team will be selected by the order of finish
<BR>>> in<BR>>> F3A by U.S. pilots at the 2006 U.S. Nationals.
All TSP participants will<BR>>> have to enter the U.S. Nationals in
order to be eligible to make the U.S.<BR>>>
Team."<BR>>><BR>>>
Earl<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>>
----- Original Message ----- <BR>>> From: <</FONT><A
href="mailto:vanputte@cox.net"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>vanputte@cox.net</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial size=2>><BR>>>
To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <</FONT><A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial
size=2>><BR>>> Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 2:10 PM<BR>>>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] USA team
trials<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>>><BR>>>>><BR>>>>>
From: "Earl Haury" <</FONT><A href="mailto:ehaury@houston.rr.com"><FONT
face=Arial size=2>ehaury@houston.rr.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial
size=2>><BR>>>>> Date: 2006/03/31 Fri PM 10:08:33
EST<BR>>>>> To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <</FONT><A
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial
size=2>><BR>>>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] USA team
trials<BR>>>>><BR>>>>> The original plan was to
hold the Team Selections for the '07 WC at next<BR>>>>> year's
Nats. However, the '07 WC are to be in April of '07 making
it<BR>>>>> necessary to move the TS to this year's Nats. If
you, or anyone else, is<BR>>>>> interested in details / entry
forms please contact Lisa Johnson<BR>>>>> (</FONT><A
href="mailto:lisaj@modelaircraft.org"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>lisaj@modelaircraft.org</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial size=2>), AMA
Competitions Dept.<BR>>>><BR>>>> My fear, which is
justified based on what AMA tried to do before, is that<BR>>>>
there will be an attempt by AMA personnel to abbreviate the Nats events
<BR>>>> in<BR>>>> the case of bad weather, so that the
Team Selection can be completed. I<BR>>>> believe that the
best combination of Nats and F3A Team Selection is to <BR>>>>
say<BR>>>> the the U.S. team is the top three placing U.S.
citizens in F3A at the<BR>>>> Nats.
Period.<BR>>>><BR>>>> Ron Van
Putte<BR>>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>>>
_______________________________________________<BR>>>>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>>>> </FONT><A
href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</FONT></A><BR><FONT face=Arial
size=2>>>> </FONT><A
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion"><FONT
face=Arial
size=2>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</FONT></A><BR><FONT
face=Arial size=2>>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>>>
_______________________________________________<BR>>>>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>>>> </FONT><A
href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</FONT></A><BR><FONT face=Arial
size=2>>>> </FONT><A
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion"><FONT
face=Arial
size=2>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</FONT></A><BR><FONT
face=Arial size=2>>><BR>>><BR>>>
_______________________________________________<BR>>>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<BR>>> </FONT><A
href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</FONT></A><BR><FONT face=Arial
size=2>>> </FONT><A
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion"><FONT
face=Arial
size=2>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</FONT></A><FONT
face=Arial size=2> <BR>> <BR>>
_______________________________________________<BR>> NSRCA-discussion
mailing list<BR>> </FONT><A
href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</FONT></A><BR><FONT face=Arial
size=2>> </FONT><A
href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion"><FONT
face=Arial
size=2>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</FONT></A><BR><FONT
face=Arial size=2>></FONT>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BLOCKQUOTE>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BLOCKQUOTE>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>