<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4807.2300" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><SPAN class=190411022-06032006><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"
color=#0000ff>Guys..I've mentioned this before. A friend of mine makes CNC'd
back plates for the OS160 to which you can adapt the OS pump. <U>ALL</U> run
flawlessly down here and are being used for active F3A
competition. Naturally, one needs to set the pipe correctly. Most run
the 17 x 12 , 17 x 13 on windy days. The 18 x 10 Mejzlick is also
good.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=190411022-06032006><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"
color=#0000ff></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=190411022-06032006><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"
color=#0000ff>I'll submit an article I did for our organisation to the
K-Factor. I have sent a plate to Jim Kimbro-haven't heard how he is going yet,
but there is one over in the US.We also lighten the motor itself ( not hard to
do).</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=190411022-06032006><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"
color=#0000ff></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=190411022-06032006><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"
color=#0000ff>Tom</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org]<B>On Behalf Of </B>Nat
Penton<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, 6 March 2006 7:48 AM<BR><B>To:</B> NSRCA
Mailing List<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fuel Regulation in 2C
Engines<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Diaphram operated fuel pumps made by OS ( Hanno,
140 RX, 91 SH <Perry?>) are self regulating in that output is
proportional to RPM, proportional to need. These pumps can be adapted to any
90 to 160 two stroke with JB Weld and without maching skills. The tank is
vented and there is no pressure in the system.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I have had impeccable performance using these
pumps on the OS91FX for the last four years. I believe the logic in the
circulating systems is
flawed.
Nat</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=vicenterc@comcast.net
href="mailto:vicenterc@comcast.net">vicenterc@comcast.net</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA Mailing List</A> ; <A
title=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA Mailing List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, March 05, 2006 12:22
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fuel
Regulation in 2C Engines</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Hi Brian,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>You got it right. In the OS 160 we would like to set up the
pressure in the header before the carb as close as possible to the original
design (muffler pressure with tank close to firewall). In this way,
the carburetor metering system will work as was originally designed. I
will be doing some test and see what will work better. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The expert at Perry recommended to send the overflow to the
tank. However, I agree that loop around the fuel pump could work since
that is one old method to control pressure in industrial pumps. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Vicente</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">--------------
Original message -------------- <BR>From: brian young
<brian_w_young@yahoo.com> <BR>
<DIV>So I guess the thinking behind doing this is that you deliver
the fuel to the carb and its there for the carb to take. But the fuel at
the carb nipple will only be under atmospheric pressure (since the tanks
vented), anything extra is free to go back to the tank. The venturi affect
of the carb will draw the fuel into the carb. I dont see why you would
need to go clear back to the tank, just loop around the pump. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>This sounds like it could take the variability of pumps out of the
equation and at the same time let the pump deliver fuel to the carb, but
not push fuel into the carb.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Interesting.<BR><BR><B><I>Wayne Galligan
<wgalligan@texasairnet.com></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1528" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Vincent,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>! <FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I wonder if this "T" setup would work on an
OS 1.40. I already use the check valve in the vent so a couple of
"T's" and maybe I would be in business. Would you have to change
the pump pressure?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Wayne Galligan</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=vicenterc@comcast.net
href="mailto:vicenterc@comcast.net">vicenterc@comcast.net</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent! :</B> Sunday, March 05, 2006
8:19 AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [NSRCA-discussion] Fuel
Regulation in 2C Engines</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>Good morning all,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I have been using the OS 160, OS 140 RX and Mintor 140 with good
results in the last 4-5 years. We have been comparing and
discussing the advantages of YS compared with 2C. One of
the main advantages of YS is that in transition when power down the
engine goes instantly to 2000 RPM or less. The 2C engines always
takes too much time to get down to idle and I believe that causes us
(in pattern) some problems. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I have been thinking that the problem is that the carburetor and
or fuel system that can not regulate properly (pressure or
flow). I think in these engines, the pumps are set to deliver
fuel at full flow (or pressure) without any regulation system
(like the YS). ! I had the opportunity to discuss this issue
with Perry Pump and they recommended to install a by-pass line.
The idea is to send the excess fuel (pressure) back to the tank during
transition. Perry Pump recommended to install the T as close as
possible to the carburetor needle valve. Also in their web site
they have an idea that he said is used for cars that is a by-pass line
that loop around the pump (<A target=_blank
href="http://www.perrypumps.com/instructions.htm">http://www.perrypumps.com/instructions.htm</A>,
Click on Pump and By-Pass Systems). I think the ideas deserve
some checking since it is natural to have this type of regulation to
maintain constant pre! ss! ure in the line before needle
valve. I tried the other day the by-pass to the carburetor but I
installed the T too far from the carburetor and forgot to open the
vent in the tank. Of course the results were bad
since I was developing vacuum in the tank. I wi! ll try these
options of by-pass lines as soon as get warmer. However, I think
someone out there already tried to do this and know results so I am
looking for feed back.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thanks in advance,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Vicente Bortone</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV></WMFILTERED></DIV>
<DIV>
<HR>
<DIV> </DIV>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<P>
<HR SIZE=1>
Relax. Yahoo! Mail <A
href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/virusall/*http://communications.yahoo.com/features.php?page=221">virus
scanning</A> helps detect nasty viruses! </BLOCKQUOTE>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.<BR>Checked by AVG Free
Edition.<BR>Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.6/257 - Release Date:
2/10/2006<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
<table><tr><td bgcolor=#ffffff><font color=#000000>************************************************************************<br>
*PLEASE NOTE* This email and any attachments may<br>
be confidential. If received in error, please delete all <br>
copies and advise the sender. The reproduction or <br>
dissemination of this email or its attachments is <br>
prohibited without the consent of the sender.<br>
<br>
WARNING RE VIRUSES: Our computer systems sweep<br>
outgoing email to guard against viruses, but no warranty <br>
is given that this email or its attachments are virus free. <br>
Before opening or using attachments, please check for <br>
viruses. Our liability is limited to the re-supply of any <br>
affected attachments.<br>
<br>
Any views expressed in this message are those of the <br>
individual sender, except where the sender expressly,<br>
and with authority, states them to be the views of the <br>
organisation.<br>
************************************************************************<br>
</font></td></tr></table>