<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>I always wanted a Jupiter painted to look like a
P-40 I still would, given the opportunity...... Bill Glaze</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=jeffghughes@comcast.net
href="mailto:jeffghughes@comcast.net">jeffghughes@comcast.net</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org
href="mailto:nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA Mailing List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, March 01, 2006 11:41
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Scale
Pattern?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>I'm with you. I'm still flying a Jupiter. Painted differently, it could
pass for a Spitfire. I also had an Ecalibur II, with it's jet like proportion
and side intakes.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">--------------
Original message -------------- <BR>From: Bob Richards <<A
href="mailto:bob@toprudder.com">bob@toprudder.com</A>> <BR>
<DIV>Bill,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thanks for the kind words.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I agree with you, I think a lot of the pattern planes are ugly. Kinda
reminds me of the old Buck Rogers rocket, hanging on a string, sparkler up
the tailpipe. I like planes that look like a real plane, that is why I flew
a Cap21 for two years in pattern. And, FWIW, I LOVE the looks of the Focus.
It looks like a stretched Cap.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>All this talk about a P51 in pattern. Hmmm, I've thought about a
stretched P47 myself. Invasion stripes -- how appropriate!!!</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Speaking of IMAC, I'm going to fly at my first IMAC contest this year.
Not sure yet what I will fly. I've toyed with the idea of flying in Basic,
just so I can fly a pattern plane. :-) I've got a 27% H9 Extra 260 I'm
working on. No 40% models in my future.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Bob R.</DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR><B><I>Bill Glaze <billglaze@triad.rr.com></I><!
/B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">I
flew a CGB Sukhoi for a long time in IMAC until they decided to go to
<BR>these outsize "models." Thanks to Bob Richards and John Ferrell I got
<BR>interested in Pattern flying at one of Bob's Pattern Primers. I went
to a <BR>couple of pattern events, and got turned off by the airplanes
that I felt <BR>were "ugly." In fact, I wasn't going to go any further
until I saw a Dick <BR>Hanson Excess, (Extra 300 semi-scale.) So, I became
highly interested in <BR>pattern, but I felt the airplanes didn't look
good, (except for Hanson's <BR>design) and I'm a sucker for a good looking
airplane. (No smart remarks, <BR>please!<G>)<BR>I even took the Sukhoi to
Muncie in 1997 to the Pattern Nats', and did <BR>better than I thought I
would. I truly loved flying the Sukhoi, (still do) <BR>and had the
opportunity to ask Dave Patrick how he came up with such a great
<BR>flying d! esign. His an! swer: "I just drew it up, and then I
stretched it <BR>until it looked like a pattern model." Hmmm.........
O.K.<BR>Than, after a serious talking-to by Gary Harris and Ed Bailey, I
was <BR>convinced that a full-blown pattern ship was required.
Fortunately, Dick <BR>Hanson had brought out his EMC^2, and with a lot of
help from John Ferrell, <BR>it was ready for the 1998 Nats.' Even now, I
prefer flying a pattern plane <BR>for just "fooling around" at the local
field. Why? Because they fly so <BR>much better, and are much easier to
fly well.<BR>If we could get somebody who is truly a prospect to fly a
pattern airplane, <BR>(and I don't mean for 5 minutes or so) out at the
local field, it would go a <BR>long way toward inculcating him with our
sport and our sporting appetites. <BR>O.K., I agree:some who evidence
interest do so out of politeness or mild <BR>curiosity. And, as it has
been said, some won't be interested; the "gallon <BR>of fuel a year" types
will tend to thi! nk w! e're kind of crazy, (which we <BR>probably
are)<BR>One thing I learned as a salesman: You've got to know who is truly
a <BR>prospect, and who is "just looking."<BR>Thanks for reading my
ramblings.<BR><BR>Bill Glaze<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></B>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>NSRCA-discussion
mailing
list<BR>NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<BR>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>