<html><body>
<DIV>Their web site recommends nothing less than a 10 pitch. So the 90 is turning 17-12 or 15.5-12 4 blade at about 6,000 rpm.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">-------------- Original message -------------- <BR>From: Glenn Hatfield <randy10926@comtekmail.com> <BR>
<P><FONT style="FONT-FAMILY: arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size=2> Some club member have been using them in scale projects. They seem very happy with the results. </FONT></P>
<P><FONT style="FONT-FAMILY: arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size=2>I am not sure they would work very well with the high pitched props that we tend to use. I wonder how well a 17X6 would work on a pattern plane?</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>Randy</FONT><FONT style="FONT-FAMILY: arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size=2> <BR>--- jeffghughes@comcast.net wrote:<BR> <BR><B>From:</B> jeffghughes@comcast.net<BR><B>Date:</B> Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:03:31 +0000<BR><B>To:</B> NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><BR><B>Subject:</B> [NSRCA-discussion] Question<BR><BR></P>
<P>I was thinking that some of the perceived benefits of electric power is the slow speed and control given by the large geared prop. Has anybody tried the RCV 4 stroke engines where the prop turns half engine speed? </P></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></body></html>