[NSRCA-discussion] New FAI Rule Changes

Derek Koopowitz derekkoopowitz at gmail.com
Wed Apr 5 09:04:32 AKDT 2023


All because of the chairman... he needs to be replaced but no one will
challenge him.

On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 9:35 AM flyintexanmark via NSRCA-discussion <
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

>
> Mark,
>
> Thank you for all your efforts.  Crazy to think any part of precision
> Aerobatics would include ambiguous geometry judging criteria. What a shame.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Mark Hunt
>
>
> Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G, an AT&T 5G smartphone
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Mark Atwood via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Date: 4/5/23 11:59 AM (GMT-05:00)
> To: FAI Discussion <f3a-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Cc: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] New FAI Rule Changes
>
> Hey All,
>
> Attached are the results from the CIAM plenary meeting and vote that took
> place on April 1st.  These rule changes will go into effect in 2024.  Most
> of the rules that address F3A are minor and merely clarify clerical issues
> in the rulebook or help outline procedures.  There are also changes to the
> wording around telemetry, but again, only for better clarity. But there are
> TWO notable rule changes.  Neither of which we supported.
>
> 1) Increase the weight limit to 5.5Kg TAKE OFF WEIGHT.   This is a
> straight up increase for electric, and a change to weighing procedure for
> glow planes to include FULL tank of fuel.   The issues here are obvious and
> I know we have many on both sides of this discussion, but it’s the new rule
> in FAI.
>
> 2) This one confounds me.   They have changed the judging guidelines, such
> that they no longer want accurate geometry relative to the aircrafts plane
> of flight, but instead want geometric accuracy FROM THE JUDGES
> PERSPECITVE.    In other words, a half loop at the end of the box needs to
> LOOK round, rather than BE round relative to the plane of flight.   It
> completely changes our way of flying and makes tools like flight coach
> useless.
>
> Personally, I can’t imagine this will last, and more over I can’t imagine
> this will actually be used.  A few of us (US/ UK / AUS) fought hard against
> it, but in the end it won out.  They had no explanation as to how cross box
> maneuvers will accomplish this (such as a rolling circle) but insisted this
> is what was wanted.  I’m sure there will be much discussion at events prior
> to this going into effect.
>
> There were also some minor changes for how ties are handled and better
> language and procedure for handling smaller championship events (<40
> pilots). But most of that is benign.
>
>
> F3A Starts on page 25
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20230405/c3e991c8/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list