[NSRCA-discussion] 2020 Nats poll

[larryd .]

I don't intend to participate in the NATs. With that said...
Wasn't the risk of losing a preferred date in Muncie part of the discussion when we chose to attempt improving participation by moving the NATs out of Muncie every other year?
If this is the case, it isn't punishment and leadership didn't fail us. It is what we have today and it was the risk we chose to take.
My .02, I could be wrong
LD

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
 
  On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 12:59 PM, Monte Richard via NSRCA-discussion<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:   _______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20190916/9d7cd501/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: Untitled
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20190916/9d7cd501/attachment-0001.ksh>