[NSRCA-discussion] FW: The FAAs Remote ID Proposal for Drones is Here!

[Bob Kane]

 After having thought about it for a bit, I suppose a radio manufacturer could produce a transmitter/receiver pair that would comply (assuming a WiFi internet connection was available). The RX would have the serial number complying with the FAA requirements.

I don't know if any current radios could/would comply, but I am sure the Airtronics SD-10G that I use for pattern would not.

Bob Kane getterflash at yahoo.com

     On Thursday, December 26, 2019, 5:29:05 PM EST, Bob Kane via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:  
 
  For example . . what does this mean to the scratch/kit builder?

"The serial number provided during registration or re-registration would have to be issued by the producer of the unmanned aircraft and comply with the ANSI/CTA-2063-A serial number standard."

Bob Kane getterflash at yahoo.com

     On Thursday, December 26, 2019, 4:15:46 PM EST, Monte Richard via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:  
 
 Oops, my old eyes misses that decimal.

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 26, 2019, at 2:15 PM, Anthony Romano <anthonyr105 at hotmail.com> wrote:



That is 0.55 lbs. We are required to register with the FAA

The proposed Remote I.D. rule would apply to all drones that are required to register with the FAA (recreational drones weighing under 0.55 pounds are not required to register), as well as to people who operate foreign civil drone in the United States.



From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on behalf of Monte Richard via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2019 3:10 PM
To: Curt Oberg <obergc at cox.net>; General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] FW: The FAAs Remote ID Proposal for Drones is Here! This is for commercial drones, it states near the bottom that recreational drones under 55lbs don’t require it.

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 26, 2019, at 12:41 PM, Curt Oberg via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:






I can't imagine that this is good news for us.

Curt Oberg

 

From: Federal Aviation Administration [mailto:usafaa at public.govdelivery.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2019 11:50 AM
To: obergc at cox.net
Subject: The FAAs Remote ID Proposal for Drones is Here!

 

| 
| 

 |
| 




We want YOU to read and comment on the Remote ID Proposal

Get ready for the next exciting step in safedrone integration! The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued theproposed rule for remote identification of drones.

With nearly 1.5 million drones and 155,000 remote pilots registered with the FAA, the ability to provide identification and location is essential to keeping drones safely separated from other aircraft operating in our airspace.  

We encourage drone enthusiasts, and anyone interested in aviation safety, to read our Notice of Proposed Rulemaking now in the Federal Register. In the next few days, a 60-day comment period will open to receive your feedback which can help us develop a final rule that enhances safety and security in our nation’s skies.

“Drones are the fastest growing segment of transportation in our nation and it is vitally important that they are safely integrated into the national airspace,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Elaine L. Chao.

“As a pilot, my eye is always on safety first,” said FAA Administrator Steve Dickson. “Safety is a joint responsibility between government, pilots, the drone community, the general public and many others who make our nation so creative and innovative.”

Equipping drones with remote identification technologies would build on previous steps taken by the FAA and the UAS industry to safely integrate operations, including thesmall UAS rule, which covers drones weighing less than 55 pounds other than model aircraft, and theLow Altitude Authorization and Notification Capability (LAANC), which automates the application and approval process for drone operators to obtain airspace authorizations.

These efforts are the foundation for more complex operations, such as beyond visual line of sight at low altitudes, as we move toward a traffic management ecosystem for drone flights separate from, but complementary to, our air traffic management system.

The proposed Remote I.D. rule would apply to all drones that arerequired to register with the FAA (recreational drones weighing under 0.55 pounds are not required to register), as well as to people who operate foreign civil drone in the United States.


 |
|  |

 |


 

| 
| 
STAY CONNECTED:
 |
| 
| 

 | 

 | 

 | 

 | 

 |

 |
| 
SUBSCRIBER SERVICES
 |
| 
Manage Preferences   |   Unsubscribe   |  Help
 |

 |


| 
This email was sent to obergc at cox.net using GovDelivery Communications Cloud on behalf of: U.S. Federal Aviation Administration · 800 Independence Avenue, SW · Washington, DC 20591 · 1-866-TELL-FAA (1-866-835-5322)
 | 

 |



_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flists.nsrca.org%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2fnsrca-discussion&c=E,1,M10fMcGM4s7nf2SJ_buK7RgfsaWwi9rc-eo8iR_05IzPoPwkKklrzeF-ke-h9GbAmMaDNvdthjvassafzT9Hd_e96yRbxZamSf5R9RR1A-7ZzTqD8F4P&typo=1
(c) 2019 Compass Engineering & Consultants, LLC. All rights reserved. This electronic transmission, and any attachments hereto, is intended only for the use of each individual recipient named above and may contain information belonging to the sender that is confidential, proprietary, is subject to copyright, constitutes a trade secret or is legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately (i) notify the sender, (ii) permanently delete the original and all copies of this electronic transmission and all attachments hereto, and (iii) destroy all printouts of this electronic transmission and all attachments hereto. Please note that electronic transmissions to and from the sender may be monitored by the sender's employer. Thank you for your cooperation.

(c) 2019 Compass Engineering & Consultants, LLC. All rights reserved. This electronic transmission, and any attachments hereto, is intended only for the use of each individual recipient named above and may contain information belonging to the sender that is confidential, proprietary, is subject to copyright, constitutes a trade secret or is legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately (i) notify the sender, (ii) permanently delete the original and all copies of this electronic transmission and all attachments hereto, and (iii) destroy all printouts of this electronic transmission and all attachments hereto. Please note that electronic transmissions to and from the sender may be monitored by the sender's employer. Thank you for your cooperation.
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion  _______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20191226/92b2a199/attachment.html>