[NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question

Gerald Budd jerry at buddengineering.com
Thu Aug 15 13:44:30 AKDT 2019


There’s no downgrade for a maneuver not being flown at constant speed.  Style (or presentation) is not a judge-able metric as it is inherently subjective.  However, there’s nothing to keep the pilot from flying a presentation that makes it easy for the judges to forget to apply all of the downgrades that the rest of the pilots observe while watching the flight back in the pits.  ;-)

Jerry Budd


> On Aug 15, 2019, at 11:34 AM, Vicente Bortone via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
> 
> For me it is easier to see the roll rate change.  However, if a particular judge can see both and he or she has been downgrading during the contest for both he or she will be correct since I think  this maneuver should be symmetrical.  Lets be aware that pilot could change plane speed to make it symmetrical and get only one downgrade.  However, that could be another downgrade for not constant speed.  Clearly the stuff we do is not easy. 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 8:15 AM Don Ramsey via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:
> I finally have the World Championships posted on my site in an easy to read pdf format.
> 
> http://pages.suddenlink.net/donramsey <http://pages.suddenlink.net/donramsey>
>  
> 
>  
> 
> An interesting judging question came up the other day and I would like to get some feedback from the group. 
> 
>  
> 
> Are rolling maneuvers, like the current Masters 2 slow rolls reversed, an asymmetrical maneuver?  If the maneuver finishes the first roll just before center (as it should) then changes the roll rate causing the line length of the second roll to be different from the first, should this be considered a centering error in additon to the change in roll rate.
> 
>  
> 
> Don
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion <http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion>_______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20190815/b5d295ac/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list