[NSRCA-discussion] Arming Device for electric airplanes

[John Pavlick]

Really? People in  the pits can see that little arming plug? Hell, most of
those crotchety old guys can barely see the airplane! LOL

 

John Pavlick

Cell: 203-417-4971

 



Integrated Development Services

 

 

 

From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> On Behalf
Of Peter Vogel via NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 10:36 AM
To: Bob Kane <getterflash at yahoo.com>; Ken Dunlap <kdunlap at hotmail.com>;
General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>;
ronlock at comcast.net
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Arming Device for electric airplanes

 

Maybe not (though it is FAR more likely, especially if they armed it, which
is what I always have my callers (who are sometimes sportsman pilots) do).
Further, even if they don't, People in the pits can SEE that it is still
armed, which is PART OF THE POINT.  

 

Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef> 

  _____  

From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
<mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> > on behalf of Bob Kane
via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> >
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 7:32:47 AM
To: Ken Dunlap; General pattern discussion; ronlock at comcast.net
<mailto:ronlock at comcast.net> 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Arming Device for electric airplanes 

 

Except the unfamiliar/inexperienced caller would probably not remove the
arming plug either . . .

Bob Kane getterflash at yahoo.com <mailto:getterflash at yahoo.com> 

--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 9/27/18, ronlock--- via NSRCA-discussion
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Arming Device for electric airplanes
 To: "Ken Dunlap" <kdunlap at hotmail.com <mailto:kdunlap at hotmail.com> >,
"General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> >
 Date: Thursday, September 27, 2018, 10:17 AM
 
 
 
     
 Among our challenges to follow a
 procedure ....    Plane lands,
 flight is complete.   While a
 helper/ caller, perhaps unfamiliar with that
 specific airplane, retrieves it from the runway, the
 pilot gets involved in a conversation - how flight went,
 that he is needed to judge, to call for someone, else,
 etc.  Similar items may be pulling on the
 helper/caller.  Plane now sits where?  For how
 long?  And is disarmed?   A clearly
 visible arming plug would be a big help.
 Ron Lockhart
 On September 26, 2018 at 8:14 PM
 Ken Dunlap via NSRCA-discussion
 <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> wrote: 
  
 Well, I am going to
 chime in with my experience. I use the Arm-safe. I have over
 1000+ flights on airplanes with this system and it has been
 bulletproof. I know there are thoughts about single points
 of failure etc etc. But here's my experience.. I have
 never seen an arming system fail, but I have seen countless
 airplanes go careening off into fences and fields because
 the pilot forgot to deactivate his/her airplane. I am
 entirely supportive of an arming rule that requires a hard
 disconnect of the airplane.
 Cheers,Ken 
  
  _______________________________________________
 NSRCA-discussion mailing list
 NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
 http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
 -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
 
 
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20180927/2e86974f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 735 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20180927/2e86974f/attachment.png>