[NSRCA-discussion] Election

Sun Dec 23 07:57:02 AKST 2018

If and only if the Board members met in secret and discussed the election I
could see a issue that the election possibly wasn’t fair and it could be
concluded that it was tainted,
But that isn’t what happened!!!
Any member worthy of a position in the nsrca is following the election,
it’s not a secret, EVERYONE KNOWS ITS CLOSE.  The discussion during a board
meeting that results were close and might require a runoff is/was made
public. Because the discussion was made public I see no issue or unfair
advantage to any member.The Board can’t change anyone’s vote.

And By the Way :
MERRY CHRISTMAS!!!

On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 9:40 AM Vogel, Peter <Peter_Vogel at intuit.com> wrote:

> I would agree with you if that were the case Dave, but...
>
> Disclaimer: I was not at the board meeting in question however...
>
> If the knowledge that “the vote is very close” had been kept secret to the
> board, THEN we would have an ethics issue as it would allow the incumbent
> candidate to sway things.  However, the action the board took was to tell
> *everyone* via this list, district lists, AND Facebook “the vote is close,
> voting closes on Dec 31st” to encourage participation of the entire
> membership.  In my mind that’s not trying to sway the vote as it is telling
> everyone the same thing, regardless of which candidate they support.
>
> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on
> behalf of davel322--- via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 23, 2018 8:23 AM
> *To:* 'Cliff Bradford'; 'General pattern discussion'; 'Larry Diamond'
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Election
>
> This email is from an external sender.
>
> If one candidate is aware of the vote count, and another candidate is not
> aware of the vote count, is that fair?  Does one candidate have an
> advantage?
>
>
>
> If one candidate has an unfair advantage due to structural administrative
> process/error…..the election is tainted.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> *On
> Behalf Of *Cliff Bradford via NSRCA-discussion
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 23, 2018 10:25 AM
> *To:* General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>;
> Larry Diamond <ldiamond at diamondrc.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Election
>
>
>
> There are only 410 nsrca members, voting electronically assures you must
> be logged in and can only vote once. I’m sure any mail in ballots will be
> verified for membership and authenticity. As long as we don’t receive 411
> or more ballots I see no issue.
>
> I think it is the boards duty to keep track of the election process. To
> think that it’s possibe to sway the election by knowing its a close
> election is silly. In fact it may incourage a higher participation
> percentage and that is all good.
>
> The board cannot change the ballots.
>
> We are a very small group and getting smaller because of things like this.
> I’m good with the election as it stands, if the board caves to the peer
> pressure and tosses this one, it would not change my vote. Would it change
> yours?  That would be more damaging than the board discussion about how
> close the election was.
>
> Perhaps we should contact the FBI to investigate any possible
> consequences!!!
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 8:07 AM Larry Diamond via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
> Almost feels like a lynching of the election.
>
>
>
> If the real time vote tallies were not compromised, would everyone still
> think the Election should be voided? I would not. However, we may still
> have an integrity or ethics issue the BoD needs to deal with it, if a BoD
> member made such a comment as it is reckless to imply knowledge of the
> ongoing results. If it was not a BoD member that made the comment, then
> freedom of speech prevails and it’s a non-issue.
>
>
>
> We need to know the facts. The BoD needs to take control and investigate
> it. If the facts are that the count was compromised, then the results
> should be voided and a new voting period began.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Larry Diamond
>
>
>
> *From:* NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Ken Dunlap via NSRCA-discussion
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 23, 2018 8:08 AM
> *To:* David Harmon <k6xyz at sbcglobal.net>; General pattern discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Election
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> This is wrong at so many levels. Let’s void this election. You just don’t
> start tallying ballots before the election closes.
>
>
>
> Ken Dunlap
>
>
>
> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on
> behalf of David Harmon via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Sent:* Saturday, December 22, 2018 11:07:03 PM
> *To:* 'General pattern discussion'
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Election
>
>
>
> Plus 2 or 3 or 16…..jeeeze…
>
>
>
> *David Harmon*
>
> *NSRCA 586*
>
> *AMA 5053*
>
>
>
> *From:* NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>] *On Behalf Of *Jon Bruml via
> NSRCA-discussion
> *Sent:* Saturday, December 22, 2018 9:54 PM
> *To:* Pete Cosky <pcosky at comcast.net>; Frackowiak Tony <
> frackowiak at sbcglobal.net>; General pattern discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Election
>
>
>
> Yes agreed
>
>
>
> We will have to nullify the election and start a new process
>
>
>
> Jonathan Bruml
>
> Techstyles
>
> www.techstyles.com
> <https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.techstyles.com&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc417d0380fc94894a51508d66894835c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636811384401721519&sdata=8YtFAcPkiKTqJ6VMIogt9GD3FIjqTYG9ijvYvIOFD%2FI%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on
> behalf of Pete Cosky via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Sent:* Saturday, December 22, 2018 7:52 PM
> *To:* Frackowiak Tony; General pattern discussion
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Election
>
>
>
> It may be the end of days because I agree with Frak.
>
>
>
> There is absolutely no reason why the data should have been available let
> alone discussed.
>
>
>
> The big question now is how do we recover?
>
> Sent from my mobile device
>
>
> On Dec 22, 2018, at 9:52 PM, Frackowiak Tony via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
> I’m sorry that you don’t see the impropriety here. You have an incumbent
> officer running for re-election able to see just how close the election is
> and then being able to drum up more votes for himself.
>
>
>
> This election is now tainted. No one should be able to see the vote tally
> before the voting period has ended. The election should be nullified, the
> party or parties involved in releasing the vote tally prior to the
> conclusion of voting should be censured and removed from the process. The
> election should be held again and the voting results sent to an outside
> party. After the end of their normal term no decisions should be made by
> the BOD until a proper election can be held and the newly elected officers
> installed.
>
>
>
> Should we as NSRCA members not be allowed a fair election?
>
>
>
> Tony Frackowiak
>
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 22, 2018, at 5:41 PM, Monte Richard <
> mrichard at compassengineering.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> The discussion was centered around the fact that the voting was close to
> encourage the district Vice Presidents to encourage the members in their
> districts to cast their votes. It appears to have worked as this election
> looks like it will have the highest voter turnout in NSRCA history.
> Certainly a lot higher then the previous election which only had a voter
> turnout of 12 members.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Dec 22, 2018, at 6:09 PM, Tony Frackowiak via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrcaorg <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:
>
> I was looking at the minutes of the December 12th NSRCA BOD meeting.
> During that meeting according to the minutes there was a discussion about
> the current vote count in the election.
>
>
>
> Isn’t voting open until the end of the month?  And isn’t there a longer
> time for mailed in ballots to be received? Why are the votes being tallied
> and discussed by the Board before the end of the voting period?
>
>
>
> That is highly unethical and smacks of voting fraud. At the very least it
> sounds like an attempt to influence the results.
>
>
>
> I will await a reply.
>
>
>
> Tony Frackowiak
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> <https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.nsrca.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fnsrca-discussion&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc417d0380fc94894a51508d66894835c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636811384401721519&sdata=8j%2BjZJQx3EK3OhjJQARvsxSpfDsfq7oHH9dMIvsZi2A%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
> (c) 2018 Compass Engineering & Consultants, LLC. All rights reserved. This
> electronic transmission, and any attachments hereto, is intended only for
> the use of each individual recipient named above and may contain
> information belonging to the sender that is confidential, proprietary, is
> subject to copyright, constitutes a trade secret or is legally privileged.
> If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance
> on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this transmission in error, please immediately (i) notify the
> sender, (ii) permanently delete the original and all copies of this
> electronic transmission and all attachments hereto, and (iii) destroy all
> printouts of this electronic transmission and all attachments hereto.
> Please note that electronic transmissions to and from the sender may be
> monitored by the sender's employer. Thank you for your cooperation.  
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> <https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.nsrca.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fnsrca-discussion&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc417d0380fc94894a51508d66894835c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636811384401721519&sdata=8j%2BjZJQx3EK3OhjJQARvsxSpfDsfq7oHH9dMIvsZi2A%3D&reserved=0>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> --
>
> Cliff
>
-- 
Cliff
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20181223/31da869e/attachment.html>