[NSRCA-discussion] Zero Judges at WC's

[Maureen Dunphy]

Why were there only 10 judges?

On Nov 14, 2017 3:00 PM, "Derek Koopowitz via NSRCA-discussion" <
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

> Typically there are 20 judges at a WC.  During the finals, 5 judges are
> used to judge the left turnarounds, 5 different judges judge the right
> turnarounds, and the 10 remaining judges judge the center maneuvers.  It is
> a lot easier to judge unknowns when one has time to study the maneuver
> before judging it and can reflect on what one saw after it is complete –
> remember, a judge will have time to reflect on this because they aren’t
> judging every maneuver.  When only 10 judges are used (as in Argentina),
> all the judges will judge ALL maneuvers so there is a lot less time for
> judges to think about what they just saw (or will see) unless they really
> know the sequence well.
>
>
>
> *From: *NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on
> behalf of NSRCA List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Reply-To: *Jeff Worsham <jeffryworsham at gmail.com>, NSRCA List <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Date: *Tuesday, November 14, 2017 at 11:20 AM
> *To: *"cahochhalter at yahoo.com" <cahochhalter at yahoo.com>, NSRCA List <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Zero Judges at WC's
>
>
>
> Obviously I don’t know squat about the whole process, but was just
> wondering-  if there’s a 10 judge panel, why can’t 2 of them be zero
> judges.  I understand if running 2 lines, 5 judges per line, there would
> need to be 4 more judges paid for.  But aren’t the final rounds flown on
> one line only with all 10 judges?  If so, why can’t 2 of them be zero
> judges?
>
>
>
> *From: *NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on
> behalf of Charles Hochhalter via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Reply-To: *"cahochhalter at yahoo.com" <cahochhalter at yahoo.com>, General
> pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Date: *Tuesday, November 14, 2017 at 12:12 PM
> *To: *"nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> >
> *Subject: *Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Zero Judges at WC's
>
>
>
> The cost to add zero judges would be around 4 -6 grand each unless you
> pulled from contestants... which probably  wouldnt happen.
>
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> <https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Jeff Worsham via NSRCA-discussion
>
> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
> What would it take for FAI to require a minimum # of zero judges at future
> WC’s?  IE: at least two designated zero judges required for every semi’s
> and finals round.  With the increase in complexity of maneuvers in F and
> unknown sequences, sounds like the judging load may be exceeding what even
> the most experienced of judges can keep up with at a WC.  On top of
> increased judging load, add poor visibility, poor conditions, etc and the
> chance for error goes up even more.
>
> Jeff
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing
> list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/
> mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing
> list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/
> mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20171114/98b0bab8/attachment.html>