[NSRCA-discussion] F3A World Result
davel322 at comcast.net
davel322 at comcast.net
Mon Nov 13 12:49:56 AKST 2017
Joseph was the top Jr from the US Team trials, and therefore, part of the US Team, and eligible to be counted towards the Team result. For countries that can field 4 man Teams, the top 3 pilots count towards the Team result. An individual attending the WC as defending Jr/Sr Champion and NOT part of a country Team does not count towards the Team result. It is, theoretically then possible to have 6 people from one country fly in the WC……3 man team plus 1 jr member, a defending WC, and a defending Jr WC……but only the 3 plus 1 are eligible to count for the Team result.
Regards,
Dave
From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Jon Lowe via NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 4:35 PM
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] F3A World Result
In other words, if Joseph had elected to return this year as reigning Junior WC rather than as part of the team, we could have sent another Junior this year. Not sure if other Juniors entered the team trials at the 2016 Nats, but assuming some did, one of them could have gone. Joseph's placement this year would have not contributed toward the team championship though.
Jon
_____
On Monday, November 13, 2017 Derek Koopowitz via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> > wrote:
Kevin,
The point of that rule was to level the playing field, so to speak, so that a Junior WC could still defend their title at the next WC. That was never the case in the 3 prior WCs - the Junior category was added to the WCs in 2011. Also, the Jury can't make a decision for everyone - they can only impact the WC in progress. Now, if a rule change is needed, or a clarification needs to be made going forward, based on the decision of the Jury at a WC (based on a protest), then this type of issue needs to be raised at the F3A Sub-committee level, and once there is agreement there then it should be voted and accepted at the Bureau level. If a clarification is made then it needs to be official and the wording needs to be changed to address it.
BTW, I'm all for increasing the exposure of young people to the sport at the highest level.
-Derek
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Kevin Young via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> > wrote:
Derek, I know this may not be your intent but how I read the rule is basically as a two part statement with
a) The reigning Junior World or Junior Continental Champion has the right (subject to the approval of his National Airsports Control) to participate in the next World or Continental Championships in that category regardless of whether he qualifies for the national team or not, and provided that he will still be a junior pilot when the next World or Continental Championships are held
b) If he is not a member of the national team, his score will not be considered in the team results. (I think the underlined section can be read as the catch to the wording of the rule)
The b portion allowing him to compete but not as an official Team participant like QuiQue did in Portugal.
my other thought is why on earth you would want to limit a young persons exposure to competition in an industry and sport that is severely lacking youth!
Kevin Young
_____
From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> > on behalf of Derek Koopowitz via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> >
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 1:45 PM
To: Don Ramsey; 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] F3A World Result
That is not the intent of the rule and I should know because I wrote it. Here is the rule:
d) The reigning Junior World or Junior Continental Champion has the right (subject to the approval of his National Airsports Control) to participate in the next World or Continental Championships in that category regardless of whether he qualifies for the national team or not, and provided that he will still be a junior pilot when the next World or Continental Championships are held. If he is not a member of the national team, his score will not be considered in the team results.
The key words here are "and provided that he will still be a junior pilot when the next World or Continental Championships are held. Also, the first sentence states "participate in the next World or Continental Championships in that category" - the category is Junior.
I don't know where the ambiguity comes in.
On 11/13/17, 10:22 AM, "Don Ramsey" <donramsey at gmail.com <mailto:donramsey at gmail.com> > wrote:
Derek, according to the jury he can return as an individual if he is over 18 but would not be part of the team. So, could have 5 US entrants but only 4 team members.
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Derek Koopowitz via NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 10:38 AM
To: Jas S; NSRCA List; Bob Kane
Cc: MarkAtwood
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] F3A World Result
Provided he will be 18 or younger in 2019. Will he?
On 11/12/17, 5:50 PM, "NSRCA-discussion on behalf of Jas S via NSRCA-discussion" <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on behalf of nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> > wrote:
He already gets a free pass to Italy for being reigning Jr. Champion (according to the rules)
Jas iP
> On Nov 12, 2017, at 8:21 PM, Bob Kane via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> > wrote:
>
> And an amazing team effort I must say !!!!!! Looks like Joseph is ready for the 2019 team without the Junior status.
>
> Bob Kane getterflash at yahoo.com <mailto:getterflash at yahoo.com>
>
> --------------------------------------------
> On Sun, 11/12/17, Atwood, Mark via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> > wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] F3A World Result
> To: "Bill Harden" <flyinbill1 at bellsouth.net <mailto:flyinbill1 at bellsouth.net> >
> Cc: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> >
> Date: Sunday, November 12, 2017, 3:19 PM
>
>
>
> Onda
> CPLR
> Shulman
> Jesky
> Bruckman
> Lassi (Finland)
> Kaiser
> Szczur
> Glenn
> Trumpp
>
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 12, 2017, at 5:08 PM, Bill Harden <flyinbill1 at bellsouth.net <mailto:flyinbill1 at bellsouth.net> >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> #yiv2101667059
> #yiv2101667059 --
>
> _filtered #yiv2101667059 {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
> _filtered #yiv2101667059 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15
> 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
> #yiv2101667059
> #yiv2101667059 p.yiv2101667059MsoNormal, #yiv2101667059
> li.yiv2101667059MsoNormal, #yiv2101667059
> div.yiv2101667059MsoNormal
> {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;}
> #yiv2101667059 a:link, #yiv2101667059
> span.yiv2101667059MsoHyperlink
> {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}
> #yiv2101667059 a:visited, #yiv2101667059
> span.yiv2101667059MsoHyperlinkFollowed
> {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}
> #yiv2101667059 p.yiv2101667059msonormal0, #yiv2101667059
> li.yiv2101667059msonormal0, #yiv2101667059
> div.yiv2101667059msonormal0
> {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:11.0pt;}
> #yiv2101667059 span.yiv2101667059apple-style-span
> {}
> #yiv2101667059 span.yiv2101667059EmailStyle20
> {color:windowtext;}
> #yiv2101667059 .yiv2101667059MsoChpDefault
> {font-size:10.0pt;}
> _filtered #yiv2101667059 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
> #yiv2101667059 div.yiv2101667059WordSection1
> {}
> #yiv2101667059
> Would someone please tell
> me the final result? Thanks.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20171113/ac22b002/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list