[NSRCA-discussion] LONG conversation with Joe Walker on NATs, sequence proposals, and other NSRCA issues.

Vogel, Peter Peter_Vogel at intuit.com
Tue Jun 20 14:04:54 AKDT 2017


What?  Board members aren’t allowed to have a sense of humor?  Without that, it would be hard to stay a board member!

Peter+

From: Frackowiak Tony <frackowiak at sbcglobal.net<mailto:frackowiak at sbcglobal.net>>
Date: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 at 3:00 PM
To: "Vogel, Peter" <Peter_Vogel at intuit.com<mailto:Peter_Vogel at intuit.com>>, General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] LONG conversation with Joe Walker on NATs, sequence proposals, and other NSRCA issues.

Interesting viewpoint from an NSRCA Board member. Sort of speaks volumes.

Tony Frackowiak

On Jun 20, 2017, at 2:54 PM, Vogel, Peter via NSRCA-discussion wrote:

<Image.png>

Sums up every pattern flyer I know, and even more so the stuff that happens on this list...

Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>> on behalf of Ronald Van Putte via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 2:46:33 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] LONG conversation with Joe Walker on NATs, sequence proposals, and other NSRCA issues.

I might be doing SPA right now if the rules weren’t so messed up.  No retracts or pipes, but you may use .90 cu in+ 4-strokes!  Many of the Daddy Rabbit, Intruder and Dirty Birdy airplanes have dimensions that are in excess of the allowable discrepancies from the original models, particularly the fuselage length.  A friend had a Curare and a Super Curare, but only the Curare was acceptable and the only real difference was in the canopy area.  Go figure.

I walked away from the SPA more than 20 years ago, but, even with the messed up rules, I might go back.

Ron Van Putte

On Jun 20, 2017, at 4:32 PM, Wayne Galligan via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:

SPA is doing that now...   there are 5 SPA contests in the DFW area alone.   I couldn’t do 5 AMA Pattern events within 3-6hrs of here now.

From: Frackowiak Tony via NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 2:26 PM
To: Curt Oberg
Cc: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] LONG conversation with Joe Walker on NATs,sequence proposals, and other NSRCA issues.

We can only dream, can't we.

Tony Frackowiak

On Jun 20, 2017, at 11:29 AM, Curt Oberg wrote:

If we're not careful, perhaps AMA pattern will evolve back into Curare's with retracts and a screaming piped .61 glow powered engine up front with a single maneuver each pass.  Who knows?
Curt Oberg

________________________________

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170620/79db0462/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list