[NSRCA-discussion] Survey

[Whodaddy Whodaddy]

Its very funny to me .. I've flown in several nats over the years and have finished first all the way down to last in the class i was in I've judged up and down the classes..NEVER "NEVER" has quality of judging been blamed by myself ... Our sport has subjective judging "fact of life" ... I've seen other judges score sheets judging the same flyer i wuz judging and wondered wat the hell he was looking at because our scores obviously did not match and these individuals are considered to be quality judges as am or wuz I according the ranking system.. 

My point being who decides what quality judging is .. Ive had one hand full  of persons judge me that i thought was seeing the crap that i wuz doing in the air .. And thats the point ,my opinion is just that my opinion.. 
How can u quantify what a quality judge is " the ranking system has flaws, id go into why but choose not to bruise ego's as to why its flawed " my opinion .. 

If one thinks perceived judging quality can be fixed by changing the format of the finals ur off base . What about judging leading to the finals aren't those rounds just as important after all they decide who's got the opportunity to fly in the finals .. whats the fix for that .. 

Until we go to a electronic based tracking system quality is in the eye of the beholder..
YOU CAN'T change or fix that.. 

😁Gary Courtney

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 17, 2017, at 10:59 PM, David Harmon via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
> 
> Probably to avoid the survey issue becoming another reason to not renew NSRCA membership next year.
> I’m pretty sure that members do not want the NSRCA as a ‘us and them’ organization….but the below sure sounds like it!!
> Small potatoes either way it goes but I definitely think EVERYONE should be able to voice their opinion.
>  
>  
>  
> David Harmon
> Sperry, OK
>  
> From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Don Ramsey via NSRCA-discussion
> Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2017 8:13 PM
> To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Survey
>  
> Just to satisfy my curiosity. 
>  
> If you are not going to the NATS to Masters why do you think you should be surveyed as to what Masters will do at the NATS this year? 
>  
> There are only 10 people, the Masters finalists, who this will affect if the current plan is implemented.  If the old format is flown there will probably be only 8 finalists.  This is a no brainer for me.  Put 25% more pilots in the finals.
>  
> Don
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170618/badfec6f/attachment.html>