[NSRCA-discussion] Mike Harrison

Tue Jun 6 07:04:57 AKDT 2017

I'm in full support of Mike, Don, and Al.  A board meeting (any executive board) is where innovative ideas go to die.

-------- Original message --------From: Jon Lowe via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> Date: 6/6/17  9:27 AM  (GMT-06:00) To: Matthew Finley <rcfin02 at msn.com>, NSRCA <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Mike Harrison 
AMEN. Any changes in format should have been blessed by the NSRCA BoD with input from the membership months ago. It's still not clear to me (and apparently Al Glenn) who the ED is. If it was changed, by whom and when?
I anxiously await BoD input here.
Jon
On Jun 6, 2017 8:42 AM, Matthew Finley via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

I really don't have a steak on the grill here, however I feel everyone has had good points, and some points that maybe are being misunderstood, or misconstrued. I am hopping that during the Exec meeting this week, these can get ironed out or at least most
 of them, and then everyone will be on the same page. It seems to me that all of these issues, and or ideas should have been ironed out months ago, and not being discussed almost a month away from the event. 

Let's Remember, in the end, WE ARE ALL trying to develop and promote PATTERN and the Hobby we LOVE.

My .00002 Cents 

Matthew E. Finley

QCI - Technology Assistant

614-557-3846 Mobile

mfinley at qcillc.com

From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on behalf of W Anthony Abdullah via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 9:32:09 AM

To: Dave Burton; General pattern discussion

Cc: General pattern discussion

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Mike Harrison

That was my thought exactly Dave.

Go, fly, embrace the new experience and see what happens. It's about the friendships anyway.

Just don't be #11 Mr. Irrelevant (Mark ur cracking me up).

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 5, 2017, at 7:22 PM, Dave Burton via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

Mike, Remember,
No good deed goes unpunished!
Seems the pattern community resist any change like no other.
Dave

From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]
On Behalf Of Jon Lowe via NSRCA-discussion

Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 6:51 PM

To: John Fuqua; NSRCA

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Mike Harrison

I thought the point of Blytheville was to try a different locale. I don't remember anyone saying the content would be different. Changing locale is a big step by itself, and this year there is a lot to be learned.
 The situation regarding motorhomes is a case in point, and we've got 25 competitors scrambling.  Other changes to conduct of the Nats should be by competitor input, with careful consideration by the NSRCA BoD. 

Jon

On Jun 5, 2017 4:07 PM, John Fuqua via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
The whole point of Blytheville is to do "something else".   

-----Original Message----- 

From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On

Behalf Of Dr. Mike Harrison via NSRCA-discussion 

Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 3:30 PM 

To: 'Whodaddy Whodaddy'; 'General pattern discussion' 

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Mike Harrison 

Thanks Gary, 

I do understand the discontent, however, the point is to make it a quality 

event. I am going under the assumption you read my explanation for all this. 

If you consider the caliber of judging when you basically have 8 rounds of 

finals-masters,fai- in 1 day, how do you maintain quality of judging?  

The quality of flying is very high yet it is ok to use unexperienced 

haphazard judges?  You yourself complained about how much money time and 

effort you are going to spend doing this but you are willing to take 

whatever is available for judges?  Doesn't make sense.  

That is what has happened in the past.  

You are upset because you can't fly 2 more flights after having flown 8 

flights not counting all the practice flights.  

This is not a marathon event.  The purpose is to select the best pilot to 

the best of our ability.  8 flights should be enough. 

I cannot promise you the best judges even under this new system but it is 

important to try something else. 

Regards, 

Mike 

-----Original Message----- 

From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On

Behalf Of Whodaddy Whodaddy via NSRCA-discussion 

Sent: Saturday, June 3, 2017 5:38 PM 

To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org

Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Mike Harrison 

I have communicated with many entrants for the NATS this year that are not 

happy with the plan for the finals in masters and FAI .. 

I guess i get to be the poster boy for discontent over this ... 

IE it seems you are not taking suggestions or input from a general 

membership ... 

While many appreciate the effort it takes to run an event like this the 

notion of cutting off the finals to two rounds and flying FAI in the 

afternoon seems off base for many reasons ... 

I do appreciate your effort and hard work and wish you to reconsider these 

plans ... 

The legacy of the event is after all in your hands 

Gary  

Sent from my iPhone 

_______________________________________________ 

NSRCA-discussion mailing list 

NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org

http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________ 

NSRCA-discussion mailing list 

NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org

http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________ 

NSRCA-discussion mailing list 

NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org

http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

Virus-free.

www.avg.com 

_______________________________________________

NSRCA-discussion mailing list

NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org

http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170606/1051c2fc/attachment.html>