[NSRCA-discussion] Why bother

[Derek Koopowitz]

Why are you so literal, Tony?  The minutes state that “positive feedback from most” was received.  Perhaps the majority of D7 pilots that expressed their opinion to Dan like the proposals.  So you are essentially discounting the “most” because you don’t like them?

 

From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on behalf of NSRCA List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Reply-To: "frackowiak at sbcglobal.net" <frackowiak at sbcglobal.net>, NSRCA List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 2:34 PM
To: NSRCA List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Why bother

 

Just thought I'd relay a recent experience to point out why many are feeling that their voices aren't heard in the NSRCA. Jon Lowe posted about the recent BOD meeting and to make sure to get their opinions in to their DVP's. So I did. I sent this to my DVP.

 

I am letting you know that I am completely against the proposed Masters Sequence submitted to the membership for comments.

 

He replied with this,

 

I will forward that along.

 

The Minutes posted to the website say that this was what was expressed by my DVP,

 

Proposed sequences has positive feedback from most

 

Pretty easy to see why most no longer bother.

 

Tony Frackowiak

_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170719/e51feefc/attachment.html>