[NSRCA-discussion] The most important thing to understand about pattern

[Atwood, Mark]

Well, not in the last 15 years.   I started in Novice in 1989, Sportsman (Intermediate) in 91, Advanced 94, Masters ’97, and FAI in 2000.  Didn’t fly F until they introduce the semi-finals at the Nats maybe in ’05?  Didn’t fly F without panicking until 2011.

Obviously we had Andrew go through the ranks when he started, but again, not in the last 10-15 years.    My son is on that path, but alas, college has slowed him at Masters.


MARK ATWOOD
o.  (440) 229-2502
c.  (216) 316-2489
e.  atwoodm at paragon-inc.com<mailto:atwoodm at paragon-inc.com>

Paragon Consulting, Inc.
5900 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 205, Cleveland Ohio, 44124
www.paragon-inc.com<http://www.paragon-inc.com/>

<http://www.paragon-inc.com/>
Powering The Digital Experience

On Jul 13, 2017, at 9:09 PM, Frackowiak Tony via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:

So, back to my original question of how many in the last 10-15 years have progressed through the RC Aerobatics Classes to end up flying F3A in P and F. So far we have two, Matt Kimbro and Anthony Romano. Any more?

Tony Frackowiak

On Jul 13, 2017, at 6:04 PM, Frackowiak Tony via NSRCA-discussion wrote:

Again, pay attention to the Club Class. You will get far more interest in that then Sportsman.

Tony Frackowiak

On Jul 13, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Matthew Finley via NSRCA-discussion wrote:

Well said Mark



Matthew E Finley
Q.C.I Technical Assistant
248-794-8487 mobile


-------- Original message --------
From: "Atwood, Mark via NSRCA-discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
Date: 7/13/17 1:54 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Miller Steve <Snaproll4 at aol.com<mailto:Snaproll4 at aol.com>>, General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] The most important thing to understand about pattern

At least 20 years.

And we JUST lost a very active (came to 9-10 contests a year) Intermediate pilot because the box is too much for him.  Flying Sportsman was no good because he was usually the only one, and he wanted competition rather than a participation award.   I’ve said for many years the we lost a lot of non-traveling, club participants when we went to turn-around.   But that ship has sailed and we won’t realistically be going back.

One thing I’d like to see at local contests is more attention and more flights for Sportsman pilots.  We have to make their contest experience a great one.  All too often they pay full price and get short shrift on flying and attention.  That alone could help us.

-M
MARK ATWOOD
o.  (440) 229-2502
c.  (216) 316-2489
e.  atwoodm at paragon-inc.com<mailto:atwoodm at paragon-inc.com>

Paragon Consulting, Inc.
5900 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 205, Cleveland Ohio, 44124
www.paragon-inccom<http://www.paragon-inc.com/>

<http://www.paragon-inc.com/>
Powering The Digital Experience

On Jul 13, 2017, at 1:34 PM, Snaproll4--- via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:

Mark,  Is it 20 years ago already?  That's when I started pushing for unhindered movement between classes.  As I came up through the classes I saw many people drop out because they were "sick of finishing last". Of course, if they moved back and consistently finished #1-#3, they would be shamed.  Every year that proposal would set people's hair on fire.  Why have rules that discourage participation?  On another matter, Turnaround was the death of the casual competitor. It takes a lot of practice to learn to keep a whole sequence in the box.  I think that Intermediate should have some breaks in the sequence.

Steve Miller
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170714/4dac9f96/attachment.html>