[NSRCA-discussion] Masters different sequence

[Bill Kutchell]

+1000

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 11, 2017, at 8:32 AM, John Gayer via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
> 
> I don't see a problem with the introduction of new maneuvers by the sequence committee. There should be some guidelines on what and how many could be added in any cycle. Right now there is nothing like that. 
> I tried to make the point about the Kfactors being assigned- that if there is a discussion about the proper k-factor for a maneuver, then the maneuver is too hard, not the kfactor too low. 
> An example would be the 4of 8 reversed in Stuart's sequence. Rather than a discussion about whether it should be a 4 or a 5, change the maneuver to an 8-pt from inverted. This uses an existing catalog maneuver rather than create a new one and the kfactor is listed as a 4. Takes care of three issues at once. No new maneuver, reduces difficulty creep, eliminates an unwinnable argument about 4 versus 5 and keeps the overall Kfactor where you want it.
> 
> There is an issue about adding some new maneuvers to sequences to keep the interest up for those jaded pilots who have been in a class forever. Perhaps limit those to one, possibly two new K4 or K5 per cycle and no new K1,K2 or K3s.  In the meantime, there are whole classes of maneuvers currently just taking space in the guide- square eights, figure M, diamond 8s. The list goes on and on.
> 
> One other issue. There is currently a AMA rule proposal to allow corrections after a spin due to wind. Rather than change the rule, perhaps the guide should be amended to eliminate turnaround spins and remove the requirement for at least one spin in Masters. Then the issue goes away and no rule change is required.
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion