[NSRCA-discussion] Rules proposals
ronlock at comcast.net
ronlock at comcast.net
Fri Feb 24 04:32:38 AKST 2017
I support these ideas. It could be the specific numbers would need adjustment as we get experience with them..
Our noise rule specifies a percent handicap and works well.
Ron Lockhart
>
> On February 24, 2017 at 7:09 AM Anthony Romano via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
>
> After all of the perpetual comments on the list about the weight limit and other technical rules why not change these to a score penalty instead of disqualification? This way if comes to an event with an overweight or oversize or loud airplane they get a 2% score penalty and aren't told to go home.
>
> The other big complaint is the perceived intimidation factor of flying smaller airplanes. In an effort to reduce that anxiety I am thinking about proposing a bonus to raw scores for Sportsman and Intermediate based on wing span. Planes with a span under 55" would receive a 4% bonus and under span 65" would receive a 2% bonus. It should be possible to input this during registration to automate the process.
>
> The numbers I have picked are somewhat arbitrary but the idea is people can show up with a variety of aircraft and either be rewarded for trying in the entry classes or compete without the expense and effort of complying to the comply to the current standards.
>
>
> Anthony
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170224/c6085510/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list