[NSRCA-discussion] Rules proposals

ronlock at comcast.net ronlock at comcast.net
Fri Feb 24 04:32:38 AKST 2017


I support these ideas.   It could be the specific numbers would need adjustment as we get experience with them..

Our noise rule specifies a percent handicap and works well.

Ron Lockhart

> 
>     On February 24, 2017 at 7:09 AM Anthony Romano via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>       After all of the perpetual comments on the list about the weight limit and other technical rules why not change these to a score penalty instead of disqualification? This way if comes to an event with an overweight or oversize or loud airplane they get a 2% score penalty and aren't told to go home.
> 
>     The other big complaint is the perceived intimidation factor of flying smaller airplanes. In an effort to reduce that anxiety I am thinking about proposing a bonus to raw scores for Sportsman and Intermediate based on wing span. Planes with a span under 55" would receive a 4% bonus and under span 65" would receive a 2% bonus. It should be possible to input this during registration to automate the process. 
> 
>     The numbers I have picked are somewhat arbitrary but the idea is people can show up with a variety of aircraft and either be rewarded for trying in the entry classes or compete without the expense and effort of complying to the comply to the current standards.
> 
> 
>     Anthony
> 
>      
> 


 

> _______________________________________________
>     NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>     NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>     http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170224/c6085510/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list