[NSRCA-discussion] 12S for F3A

[Bill Pritchett]

+1Adding the option of 12S is about efficiency, being nice to your batteries....  Bill
      From: "Atwood, Mark via NSRCA-discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
 To: Andrew Jesky <andrewjesky at gmail.com>; General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
 Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 5:28 PM
 Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 12S for F3A
   
 To Andrew’s point, power is already unlimited in our rules.  Glow is not constrained, only E-power.  So while normally I’m a staunch opponent to any rule change that will alter the designs of our planes and thus obsolete everything and increase costs, I don’t think supporting 12S does that.
Power is not currently limited, so allowing 12s doesn’t change the available power.  It merely allows those flying electric to do so more efficiently.  And yes… A YS200 will likely  support even larger Bipes if they can build them and make weight.

MARK ATWOODo.  (440) 229-2502 c.  (216) 316-2489 e.  atwoodm at paragon-inc.com
Paragon Consulting, Inc. 5900 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 205, Cleveland Ohio, 44124 www.paragon-inc.com  Powering The Digital Experience
On Nov 11, 2016, at 5:11 PM, Andrew Jesky via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
Then cap the wattage we can reach, But don't worry when YS comes out with there 200 that won't allow the pattern planes to grow as long as there under 5000 without fuel right? 🤔
Andrew 

Sent from my iPhone

   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20161114/fdb4eb6f/attachment-0001.html>