[NSRCA-discussion] 2017 NATS

[Keith Black]

Very puzzling response Joe. Can you explain "why" this is a bad idea and is
counterproductive to growing pattern?

And assuming that it has no growth impact, "why" is it such a terrible
thing to allow NATS move around the country every two years?

Virtual every sport I'm familiar with (professional and amateur) travels
their Nationals or World competition.

Confused,
Keith Black


On Friday, November 4, 2016, Joe Lachowski via NSRCA-discussion <
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

>
> I am disappointed in the direction the NSRCA has been going the last 5
> years. Instead of focusing on growing participation in pattern as their
> primary goal it has done things like making sequences more and more
> difficult and now having alternate venues for the NATS. So tell me how
> having alternate venues for the NATS grows pattern? Answer is absolutely
> nothing. It just wastes financial assets. This idea too, will die. Do you
> honestly think others in the various regions of the country will put in
> the effort on a regular basis to have a NATS in their region?
>
>
> I am done with the NSRCA. I've been a member since the late 80's. My
> contribution to the event as a CD over 25 years and long time sequence
> committee member has become a waste of my precious time.  My membership
> will permanently lapse this time around. I can no longer support an
> organization that is directionally lost. And you wonder why most of
> District 2 has left the NSRCA?
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20161104/2364884c/attachment.html>