[NSRCA-discussion] Nats

[Whodaddy Whodaddy]

Peter thats no exuse ... Considering all the local events flow ......

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 7, 2016, at 5:15 PM, Peter Vogel <vogel.peter at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> To avoid the possibility of a midair. 
> 
> Get Outlook for iOS
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 6:14 PM -0400, "Whodaddy Whodaddy via NSRCA-discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
> 
>> Y not fly both lines on site one even simpler ..that way we dont risk something going wrong with our planes taking them apart and putting them back together...ie like ripping the tube out of the wing or such....
>> 
>> Gary
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Jul 7, 2016, at 4:16 PM, Ronald Van Putte via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I can handle moving airplanes from site to site, but many will have to also move tents, motor homes, trailers, etc.
>>> 
>>> Ron
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Jul 7, 2016, at 3:35 PM, Atwood, Mark <atwoodm at paragon-inc.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Equal exposure applies to both Judges and conditions.   The crossing runway on site 3 gives many people fits with their positioning. 
>>>> 
>>>> Moving pilots means everyone flies in front of the same judges under the same conditions. 
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my average intelligence  phone 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Jul 7, 2016, at 4:24 PM, Ron via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Yep, all Master class competitors switch from Site 1 to Site 3 and vice versa in mid afternoon all three days. I wonder why the judges don't switch sites.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ron
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 7, 2016 11:46 AM, Whodaddy Whodaddy via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>>>> Switching sites in the same day seems a bit cumbersome 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Gary
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 7, 2016, at 7:33 AM, Albert Glenn via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm sure that draft I sent out by mistake is still floating around
>>>>> My bad 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from I-phone
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> This message, together with any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or return E-mail and delete this message, along with any attachments, from your computer. Thank you.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 7, 2016, at 7:14 AM, Stuart Chale via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> May have been mentioned but one of the dates on the web site is wrong
>>>>> 
>>>>>  "All aircraft will need to be processed prior to the Pilots Meeting at 5:00PM on Sunday July 9th."
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sunday is the 10th
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 7/6/2016 10:16 PM, Jon Bruml via NSRCA-discussion wrote:
>>>>> Thanks Scott
>>>>> I appreciate all the hard work that you guys must exert preparing for the NATS
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jonathan W. Bruml 
>>>>> Techstyles Sportswear
>>>>> 
>>>>> _____________________________
>>>>> From: Scott v via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 9:14 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Nats
>>>>> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>, Ronald Van Putte <vanputter at gmail.com>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ron, 
>>>>> 
>>>>> We just received the information less than an hour ago. We are working on getting it posted now. We only have what we've been given. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Scott
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wednesday, July 6, 2016, Ronald Van Putte via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>>>> I’ve been checking the NSRCA Nats 2016 section and am underwhelmed.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The only thing that’s “populated” is the “Contestant Information”.  There’s no Contestant List, no Contestant Schedule, no Contestant Equipment List, no Judging Assignments and no Flight Orders.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I can’t understand why the Contestant List isn’t up; entries have been closed for about ten days.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Knowing the Contestant Schedule would be good information for Master and F3A competitors to know when planning whether to take one or two tents to Muncie.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I don’t know who is supposed to be taking care of these, but I’m disappointed.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ron Van Putte
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Scott A. McHarg
>>>>> VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot
>>>>> Texas A&M University
>>>>> PPL - ASEL
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20160707/dfa81d32/attachment.html>