[NSRCA-discussion] Nats
Peter Vogel
vogel.peter at gmail.com
Thu Jul 7 13:43:51 AKDT 2016
Or just move for the few hours and do without a few amenities. We discussed this quite a bit as a board with the ED and, fundamentally, equal exposure in same environment trumps pilot convenience.
Get Outlook for iOS
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 5:17 PM -0400, "Ronald Van Putte via NSRCA-discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
I can handle moving airplanes from site to site, but many will have to also move tents, motor homes, trailers, etc.
Ron
On Jul 7, 2016, at 3:35 PM, Atwood, Mark <atwoodm at paragon-inc.com> wrote:
Equal exposure applies to both Judges and conditions. The crossing runway on site 3 gives many people fits with their positioning.
Moving pilots means everyone flies in front of the same judges under the same conditions.
Sent from my average intelligence phone
On Jul 7, 2016, at 4:24 PM, Ron via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
Yep, all Master class competitors switch from Site 1 to Site 3 and vice versa in mid afternoon all three days. I wonder why the judges don't switch sites.
Ron
On Jul 7, 2016 11:46 AM, Whodaddy Whodaddy via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
Switching sites in the same day seems a bit cumbersome
Gary
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 7, 2016, at 7:33 AM, Albert Glenn via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
I'm sure that draft I sent out by mistake is still floating around
My bad
Sent from I-phone
This message, together with any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or return E-mail and
delete this message, along with any attachments, from your computer. Thank you.
On Jul 7, 2016, at 7:14 AM, Stuart Chale via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
May have been mentioned but one of the dates on the web site is wrong
"All
aircraft will need to be processed prior to the Pilots Meeting at 5:00PM on Sunday
July 9th."
Sunday
is the 10th
On 7/6/2016 10:16 PM, Jon Bruml via NSRCA-discussion wrote:
Thanks Scott
I appreciate all the hard work that you guys must exert preparing for the NATS
Jonathan W. Bruml
Techstyles Sportswear
_____________________________
From: Scott v via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Nats
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>, Ronald Van Putte <vanputter at gmail.com>
Ron,
We just received the information less than an hour ago. We are working on getting it posted now. We only have what we've been given.
Scott
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016, Ronald Van Putte via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
I’ve been checking the NSRCA Nats 2016 section and am underwhelmed.
The only thing that’s “populated” is the “Contestant Information”. There’s no Contestant List, no Contestant Schedule, no Contestant Equipment List, no Judging Assignments and no Flight Orders.
I can’t understand why the Contestant List isn’t up; entries have been closed for about ten days.
Knowing the Contestant Schedule would be good information for Master and F3A competitors to know when planning whether to take one or two tents to Muncie.
I don’t know who is supposed to be taking care of these, but I’m disappointed.
Ron Van Putte
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
--
Scott A. McHarg
VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot
Texas A&M University
PPL - ASEL
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20160707/a57c49cf/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list