[NSRCA-discussion] Drone for (short) commutes

[Albert Glenn]

Yes

Sent from I-phone


This message, together with any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or return E-mail and delete this message, along with any attachments, from your computer. Thank you.


> On Jan 6, 2016, at 3:51 PM, Atwood, Mark via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
> 
> Doesn’t this fall under experimental aircraft like all the other personal Heli’s and such?    It’s not a drone for sure… it’s a manned Quad-copter.  
> 
> 
> On Jan 6, 2016, at 3:49 PM, Peter Vogel via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
> 
> Can't wait to see what the FAA has to say about this one!  The 184 (1 person, 8 propellers, 4 arms) capable of 23 minute flights with a person up to 260lbs -- good for about a 10 mile commute.
> 
> http://www.engadget.com/2016/01/06/184-delivery-drone-for-people/
> 
> 
> Peter+
> 
> -- 
> Director, Fixed Wing Flight Training
> Santa Clara County Model Aircraft Skypark
> Associate Vice President, Academy of Model Aeronautics District X
> Treasurer, National Society of Radio Control Aerobatics (NSRCA)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20160106/536a3040/attachment.html>