[NSRCA-discussion] FAA RESPONCE to MY LETTER

[Verne Koester]

It's not. If there's one thing I know for sure, it's that the media never gets any story exactly right. 
Verne Koester

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 18, 2016, at 7:34 PM, John Gayer via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
> 
> According to this article, insurance is required to fly a drone. I don't remember seeing that requirement on the FAA site.
> 
> http://fox43.com/2016/02/15/didnt-register-your-drone-prepare-to-pay/
> 
>> On 2/11/2016 12:37 PM, Matthew Finley via NSRCA-discussion wrote:
>> This is the FAA's Responce to my letter.
>> 
>> Thank you for your inquiry. The FAA recognizes that community-based organizations may have safety guidelines for operations above that altitude. The FAA encourages modelers to stay below 400' to lessen the probability of conflict with manned aircraft. Modelers are required to give way and may not interfere with manned aircraft. 
>> 
>> Regards, 
>> FAA UAS Integration Office
>> 
>> 
>> Matthew E. Finley
>> QCI - Technology Assistant
>> 614-557-3846 Mobile
>> mfinley at quadcityinnovations.com 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20160219/d3c74885/attachment.html>