[NSRCA-discussion] Li Graphene

[Robert Campbell]

Only when they close their transmission, "Nano, Nano, Mork signing off."

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Keith Hoard via NSRCA-discussion <
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

> Do they got “Nano” anywhere in the name or description?
>
>
>
> -Keith Hoard
>
> -klhoard at outlook.com
>
>
>
> *From:* chuenkan at comcast.net [mailto:chuenkan at comcast.net]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 3, 2016 10:36
> *To:* Keith Hoard <klhoard at outlook.com>; nsrca-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Li Graphene
>
>
>
> Yeah, Keith, especially since they're on the internet!!
>
>
>
> *Phil Spelt, KCRC Emeritus*
>
>
> *AMA 1294, Scientific Leader MemberSPA L-18, Board Member(865) 435-1476v
> (865) 604-0541c*
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> The name sounds cool, thus they must work great.
>
>
>
> -Keith Hoard
>
> -klhoard at outlook.com
>
>
>
> *From:* NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>] *On Behalf Of *John Fuqua via
> NSRCA-discussion
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 3, 2016 06:59
> *To:* 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Subject:* [NSRCA-discussion] Li Graphene
>
>
>
> I see that Hobby King is advertising Li Graphene batteries.    Does anyone
> have any experience with them.
>
>
>
> John D. Fuqua
>
> johnfuqua at embarqmail.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20160203/06af8aee/attachment.html>