[NSRCA-discussion] FAI 1/2 points

[Dana Beaton]

As a funny aside, all the wives on the D1 Scoring Team this season have asked me about this when they got to entering scores for the P round LOL!


> On Aug 1, 2016, at 3:42 PM, Scott Smith via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
> 
> I asked that same question and was told:
> 
> "No particular reason was given for the rounding up... They preferred it versus rounding down."
> 
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Stuart Chale via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:
> Some ideas and changes are just plain stupid!  There I said it :)
> 
> I have always hated the fact that some judging criteria and downgrades
> were different in FAI and AMA.  Makes judging which is a tough job to do
> right even tougher.  You have to know 2 different sets of rules and in
> the long run only lowers the accuracy of judging, most likely more so
> for the FAI fliers.  But that is another can of worms.
> 
> I thought that allowing 1/2 points in FAI sounded like a good idea, we
> are used to it in the rest of the classes.  And since the FAI pilots are
> in most part the better fliers they are more likely to make the 1/2
> point errors as compared to the greater inaccuracies usually seen in the
> lower classes.
> 
> But wait an 8.5 becomes a 9, and a 9 is still a 9  ??????
> 
> So just to prove how silly this idea can be I used Scott's scoring
> program and ran a fictitious contest with 2 flyers and 2 rounds.  I used
> a couple of friends as contestants so to not offend anyone.  I also had
> to use the masters sequence as an example, as the program automatically
> rounds up FAI scores.
> 
> Hopefully the PDF files are attached.
> 
> Each flyer received identical scores in each of their 2 flights. AR
> received all 7.5's except one maneuver which was an 8.5,  and DL all 8's
> .  In round 1 scores were not rounded up and in round 2 the scores were
> rounded up as they would automatically be done in FAI.
> 
> Look at the files for AR round 1 and DL  round 1.  It would seem pretty
> obvious who should win that round and without rounding up AR gets a
> 947.75 to DL's 1000.
> 
> Note that every maneuver but one was judged higher for DL.
> 
> Now look at AR round 2 and DL round 2 rounded up.  The same exact judges
> scores with only 1 maneuver scored higher for AR, but due to the
> rounding up AR wins the round 1000 to 989.86.
> 
> Now this is the extreme and unlikely to actually happen in a contest to
> this extent but just the fact that it works this way makes the whole
> idea of rounding up ridiculous.
> 
> Is there really an argument that this is a good thing?
> 
> Stuart C.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion <http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20160801/3cac6e68/attachment.html>