[NSRCA-discussion] Is the list super quiet?

Keith Black tkeithblack at gmail.com
Tue Apr 26 18:31:03 AKDT 2016


If that top one is an aileron roll then it certainly is a terrible one!
Major cheat pulling the elevator first. DOWNGRADE!

The cinnamon roll is just making me hungry!

Keith

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 9:25 PM, Wayne Galligan via NSRCA-discussion <
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

> How about -----
>
> *From:* Phil Spelt via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 26, 2016 6:46 PM
> *To:* Keith Black <tkeithblack at gmail.com> ; nsrca-discussion
> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Is the list super quiet?
>
> Hey, Keith, what about a tootsie roll?  Whose conspiracy is that?
>
>
>
>
>
> *Phil Spelt, KCRC EmeritusAMA 1294, Scientific Leader MemberSPA L-18,
> Board Member(865) 435-1476v  (865) 604-0541c*
>
>
> ------------------------------
> There's no such thing as a twinkle roll, this is just a conspiracy created
> by the snap nazi's to keep up and coming pilots from beating favored
> pilots.
>
> Keith Black
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Vicente Bortone via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
>> I will but it if he doesn't like it.
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 26, 2016, Dave Lockhart <davel322 at comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>> With Matt’s skills at building lightweight painted wings….I bet he could
>>> have a V4 Contra powered Allure builders kit flying at 9 lbs 15 ounces.
>>> J
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* NSRCA-discussion [mailto:
>>> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] *On Behalf Of *Vicente
>>> Bortone via NSRCA-discussion
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 26, 2016 5:27 PM
>>> *To:* Mike Mueller <mups53 at gmail.com>
>>> *Cc:* General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Is the list super quiet?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hey Matt,
>>>
>>> The question of the day to make this list go busy very fast.  When are
>>> you going to electrify one of your planes?  You need to try at least once.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>>
>>> Vicente "Vince" Bortone
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Mike Mueller <mups53 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Matt
>>>
>>> The market is very hard to gauge. I too always liked the Griffin.
>>>
>>> Mike Mueller
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016, 3:52 PM Matt Kebabjian via NSRCA-discussion <
>>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks Vince and all. The list is quiet, not a bad thing.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> As far as practice I'm hoping for some too. Maidened the gasified
>>> Griffin Sunday. A very nice flier and very light; less than 10#. As true as
>>> this plane flies, it has me scratching my head to figger why it was an
>>> unpopular plane. It had a wing spar problem but that was fixed.'
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt Kebabjian
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 26, 2016, at 3:03 PM, Vicente Bortone <vincebrc at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Everybody is practicing new schedules.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, April 26, 2016, George Kennie via NSRCA-discussion <
>>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> You're good Matt !
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Matt Kebabjian via NSRCA-discussion <
>>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Changed my email recently and have not been seeing any emails from the
>>> discussion board. Thot I changed email addys on the NSRCA site
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Mattk
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt Kebabjian
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 17, 2016, at 7:19 PM, Earl Haury <ejhaury at comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I’ve tried most of the available lenses, colors, coatings over the years
>>> for both flying and shooting. There are advantages and not to most,
>>> personal preference and correction factors play a role. Anyway, I stumbled
>>> into what I’ve found to be best for me for flying by selecting lenses for
>>> everyday use. These are Transitions Xtra Active grey (available in brown or
>>> green also)  with Crizal Sapphire non-glare coating (tried Avance version &
>>> didn’t like). Oh, and these are also  blended bifocals (Varilux?).  These
>>> are all I wear now for everyday and flying, best airplane vision I’ve had
>>> in years and the glare reduction is great for night driving. They do retain
>>> a bit of tint indoors, but very little and not a bother.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://transitions.com/en-us/products/transitions-xtractive/?gclid=CKmmgf7mlswCFY-DaQodgcoEcw
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.crizalusa.com/scratch-smudge-dust-water-uv-glare-protection/lenses.html?gclid=CJez5ZzklswCFQiJaQodoKkGUQ
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Earl
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Matt Kebabjian via NSRCA-discussion
>>>
>>> *Sent:* Sunday, April 17, 2016 3:42 PM
>>>
>>> *To:* Don Ramsey ; General pattern discussion
>>>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Contest Results
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Looking in Don's website he has some info on glasses. Zeiss hi index
>>> seem to be the best but are very hard to find.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> My current Rx glasses use plastic lenses from one of the chain eyeglass
>>> places and these truly suck rotten eggs.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm looking for the best solution for glasses that allow reasonably
>>> sharp vision at the distance of interest but with minimal glare (my current
>>> glasses are so glary I have to take them off when looking at near objects).
>>> What are folks using?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks and Regards
>>>
>>> Matt Kebabjian
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Don Ramsey via NSRCA-discussion <
>>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Results for the Gulf Coast Contest, Sulphur, LA is available on
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://pages.suddenlink.net/donramsey
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> dr
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Vicente "Vince" Bortone
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Vicente "Vince" Bortone
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20160427/f7bd1d48/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list