[NSRCA-discussion] Is the list super quiet?

Tue Apr 26 15:49:35 AKDT 2016

Hey, Keith, what about a tootsie roll? Whose conspiracy is that? 

Phil Spelt, KCRC Emeritus 
AMA 1294, Scientific Leader Member 
SPA L-18, Board Member 
(865) 435-1476v (865) 604-0541c 

----- Original Message -----

There's no such thing as a twinkle roll, this is just a conspiracy created by the snap nazi's to keep up and coming pilots from beating favored pilots. 

Keith Black 

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Vicente Bortone via NSRCA-discussion < nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org > wrote: 

I will but it if he doesn't like it. 

On Tuesday, April 26, 2016, Dave Lockhart < davel322 at comcast.net > wrote: 

<blockquote>

With Matt’s skills at building lightweight painted wings….I bet he could have a V4 Contra powered Allure builders kit flying at 9 lbs 15 ounces. J 

Regards, 

Dave 

From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org ] On Behalf Of Vicente Bortone via NSRCA-discussion 
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 5:27 PM 
To: Mike Mueller < mups53 at gmail.com > 
Cc: General pattern discussion < nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org > 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Is the list super quiet? 

Hey Matt, 

The question of the day to make this list go busy very fast. When are you going to electrify one of your planes? You need to try at least once. 

Best, 

Vicente "Vince" Bortone 

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Mike Mueller < mups53 at gmail.com > wrote: 
<blockquote>

Hi Matt 

The market is very hard to gauge. I too always liked the Griffin. 

Mike Mueller 

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016, 3:52 PM Matt Kebabjian via NSRCA-discussion < nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org > wrote: 

<blockquote>

Thanks Vince and all. The list is quiet, not a bad thing. 

As far as practice I'm hoping for some too. Maidened the gasified Griffin Sunday. A very nice flier and very light; less than 10#. As true as this plane flies, it has me scratching my head to figger why it was an unpopular plane. It had a wing spar problem but that was fixed.' 

Regards 

Matt Kebabjian 

On Apr 26, 2016, at 3:03 PM, Vicente Bortone < vincebrc at gmail.com > wrote: 

<blockquote>

Everybody is practicing new schedules. 

On Tuesday, April 26, 2016, George Kennie via NSRCA-discussion < nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org > wrote: 
<blockquote>

You're good Matt ! 

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Matt Kebabjian via NSRCA-discussion < nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org > wrote: 
<blockquote>

Changed my email recently and have not been seeing any emails from the discussion board. Thot I changed email addys on the NSRCA site 

Mattk 

Matt Kebabjian 

On Apr 17, 2016, at 7:19 PM, Earl Haury < ejhaury at comcast.net > wrote: 

<blockquote>

Matt 

I’ve tried most of the available lenses, colors, coatings over the years for both flying and shooting. There are advantages and not to most, personal preference and correction factors play a role. Anyway, I stumbled into what I’ve found to be best for me for flying by selecting lenses for everyday use. These are Transitions Xtra Active grey (available in brown or green also) with Crizal Sapphire non-glare coating (tried Avance version & didn’t like). Oh, and these are also blended bifocals (Varilux?). These are all I wear now for everyday and flying, best airplane vision I’ve had in years and the glare reduction is great for night driving. They do retain a bit of tint indoors, but very little and not a bother. 

http://transitions.com/en-us/products/transitions-xtractive/?gclid=CKmmgf7mlswCFY-DaQodgcoEcw 

http://www.crizalusa.com/scratch-smudge-dust-water-uv-glare-protection/lenses.html?gclid=CJez5ZzklswCFQiJaQodoKkGUQ 

Earl 

From: Matt Kebabjian via NSRCA-discussion 

Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2016 3:42 PM 

To: Don Ramsey ; General pattern discussion 

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Contest Results 

Looking in Don's website he has some info on glasses. Zeiss hi index seem to be the best but are very hard to find. 

My current Rx glasses use plastic lenses from one of the chain eyeglass places and these truly suck rotten eggs. 

I'm looking for the best solution for glasses that allow reasonably sharp vision at the distance of interest but with minimal glare (my current glasses are so glary I have to take them off when looking at near objects). What are folks using? 

Thanks and Regards 

Matt Kebabjian 

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Don Ramsey via NSRCA-discussion < nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org > wrote: 
<blockquote>

<blockquote>

Results for the Gulf Coast Contest, Sulphur, LA is available on 

http://pages.suddenlink.net/donramsey 

dr 

_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
</blockquote>

_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

</blockquote>

_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
</blockquote>

</blockquote>

-- 
Vicente "Vince" Bortone 

</blockquote>

_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
</blockquote>

</blockquote>

</blockquote>

-- 
Vicente "Vince" Bortone 

_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

</blockquote>

_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20160426/57650c83/attachment.html>