[NSRCA-discussion] Is the list super quiet?

Vicente Bortone vincebrc at gmail.com
Tue Apr 26 14:16:50 AKDT 2016


But = buy

On Tuesday, April 26, 2016, Vicente Bortone <vincebrc at gmail.com> wrote:

> I will but it if he doesn't like it.
>
> On Tuesday, April 26, 2016, Dave Lockhart <davel322 at comcast.net
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','davel322 at comcast.net');>> wrote:
>
>> With Matt’s skills at building lightweight painted wings….I bet he could
>> have a V4 Contra powered Allure builders kit flying at 9 lbs 15 ounces.
>> J
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]
>> *On Behalf Of *Vicente Bortone via NSRCA-discussion
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 26, 2016 5:27 PM
>> *To:* Mike Mueller <mups53 at gmail.com>
>> *Cc:* General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Is the list super quiet?
>>
>>
>>
>> Hey Matt,
>>
>> The question of the day to make this list go busy very fast.  When are
>> you going to electrify one of your planes?  You need to try at least once.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>> Vicente "Vince" Bortone
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Mike Mueller <mups53 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Matt
>>
>>  The market is very hard to gauge. I too always liked the Griffin.
>>
>>  Mike Mueller
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016, 3:52 PM Matt Kebabjian via NSRCA-discussion <
>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Vince and all. The list is quiet, not a bad thing.
>>
>>
>>
>> As far as practice I'm hoping for some too. Maidened the gasified
>>  Griffin Sunday. A very nice flier and very light; less than 10#. As true
>> as this plane flies, it has me scratching my head to figger why it was an
>> unpopular plane. It had a wing spar problem but that was fixed.'
>>
>>  Regards
>>
>>
>>
>> Matt Kebabjian
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 26, 2016, at 3:03 PM, Vicente Bortone <vincebrc at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Everybody is practicing new schedules.
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 26, 2016, George Kennie via NSRCA-discussion <
>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>
>> You're good Matt !
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Matt Kebabjian via NSRCA-discussion <
>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>
>> Changed my email recently and have not been seeing any emails from the
>> discussion board. Thot I changed email addys on the NSRCA site
>>
>>
>>
>> Mattk
>>
>> Matt Kebabjian
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 17, 2016, at 7:19 PM, Earl Haury <ejhaury at comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>>
>> I’ve tried most of the available lenses, colors, coatings over the years
>> for both flying and shooting. There are advantages and not to most,
>> personal preference and correction factors play a role. Anyway, I stumbled
>> into what I’ve found to be best for me for flying by selecting lenses for
>> everyday use. These are Transitions Xtra Active grey (available in brown or
>> green also)  with Crizal Sapphire non-glare coating (tried Avance version &
>> didn’t like). Oh, and these are also  blended bifocals (Varilux?).  These
>> are all I wear now for everyday and flying, best airplane vision I’ve had
>> in years and the glare reduction is great for night driving. They do retain
>> a bit of tint indoors, but very little and not a bother.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> http://transitions.com/en-us/products/transitions-xtractive/?gclid=CKmmgf7mlswCFY-DaQodgcoEcw
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.crizalusa.com/scratch-smudge-dust-water-uv-glare-protection/lenses.html?gclid=CJez5ZzklswCFQiJaQodoKkGUQ
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Earl
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Matt Kebabjian via NSRCA-discussion
>>
>> *Sent:* Sunday, April 17, 2016 3:42 PM
>>
>> *To:* Don Ramsey ; General pattern discussion
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Contest Results
>>
>>
>>
>> Looking in Don's website he has some info on glasses. Zeiss hi index seem
>> to be the best but are very hard to find.
>>
>>
>>
>> My current Rx glasses use plastic lenses from one of the chain eyeglass
>> places and these truly suck rotten eggs.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm looking for the best solution for glasses that allow reasonably sharp
>> vision at the distance of interest but with minimal glare (my current
>> glasses are so glary I have to take them off when looking at near objects).
>> What are folks using?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks and Regards
>>
>> Matt Kebabjian
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Don Ramsey via NSRCA-discussion <
>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>
>> Results for the Gulf Coast Contest, Sulphur, LA is available on
>>
>>
>>
>> http://pages.suddenlink.net/donramsey
>>
>>
>>
>> dr
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Vicente "Vince" Bortone
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Vicente "Vince" Bortone
>


-- 
Vicente "Vince" Bortone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20160426/5efe58cb/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list