[NSRCA-discussion] Is the list super quiet?

[Mike Mueller]

Hi Matt
 The market is very hard to gauge. I too always liked the Griffin.
 Mike Mueller

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016, 3:52 PM Matt Kebabjian via NSRCA-discussion <
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

> Thanks Vince and all. The list is quiet, not a bad thing.
>
> As far as practice I'm hoping for some too. Maidened the gasified  Griffin
> Sunday. A very nice flier and very light; less than 10#. As true as this
> plane flies, it has me scratching my head to figger why it was an unpopular
> plane. It had a wing spar problem but that was fixed.'
>  Regards
>
>
> Matt Kebabjian
>
>
> On Apr 26, 2016, at 3:03 PM, Vicente Bortone <vincebrc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Everybody is practicing new schedules.
>
> On Tuesday, April 26, 2016, George Kennie via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
>> You're good Matt !
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Matt Kebabjian via NSRCA-discussion <
>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Changed my email recently and have not been seeing any emails from the
>>> discussion board. Thot I changed email addys on the NSRCA site
>>>
>>> Mattk
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt Kebabjian
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 17, 2016, at 7:19 PM, Earl Haury <ejhaury at comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>> I’ve tried most of the available lenses, colors, coatings over the years
>>> for both flying and shooting. There are advantages and not to most,
>>> personal preference and correction factors play a role. Anyway, I stumbled
>>> into what I’ve found to be best for me for flying by selecting lenses for
>>> everyday use. These are Transitions Xtra Active grey (available in brown or
>>> green also)  with Crizal Sapphire non-glare coating (tried Avance version &
>>> didn’t like). Oh, and these are also  blended bifocals (Varilux?).  These
>>> are all I wear now for everyday and flying, best airplane vision I’ve had
>>> in years and the glare reduction is great for night driving. They do retain
>>> a bit of tint indoors, but very little and not a bother.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://transitions.com/en-us/products/transitions-xtractive/?gclid=CKmmgf7mlswCFY-DaQodgcoEcw
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.crizalusa.com/scratch-smudge-dust-water-uv-glare-protection/lenses.html?gclid=CJez5ZzklswCFQiJaQodoKkGUQ
>>>
>>>
>>> Earl
>>>
>>> *From:* Matt Kebabjian via NSRCA-discussion
>>> *Sent:* Sunday, April 17, 2016 3:42 PM
>>> *To:* Don Ramsey ; General pattern discussion
>>> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Contest Results
>>>
>>> Looking in Don's website he has some info on glasses. Zeiss hi index
>>> seem to be the best but are very hard to find.
>>>
>>> My current Rx glasses use plastic lenses from one of the chain eyeglass
>>> places and these truly suck rotten eggs.
>>>
>>> I'm looking for the best solution for glasses that allow reasonably
>>> sharp vision at the distance of interest but with minimal glare (my current
>>> glasses are so glary I have to take them off when looking at near objects).
>>> What are folks using?
>>>
>>> Thanks and Regards
>>> Matt Kebabjian
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Don Ramsey via NSRCA-discussion <
>>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Results for the Gulf Coast Contest, Sulphur, LA is available on
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://pages.suddenlink.net/donramsey
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> dr
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Vicente "Vince" Bortone
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20160426/de4e92c6/attachment.html>