[NSRCA-discussion] 2016/17 Advanced and Masters

[Ron Hansen]

The current advanced sequence has a top hat ¾ up ¼ down exit inverted.  Why
shouldn’t Master have something similar??

 

From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On
Behalf Of blotch44026--- via NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2015 7:24 PM
To: Herb Kurlan; blotch44026 at mypacks.net; General pattern discussion; Dan
Underkofler; Jon Lowe
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2016/17 Advanced and Masters

 

So adding the inline option initially was an over-site? The explanation for
removing it was the impracticability of it, make it practical and we are
good.

Rick  

-----Original Message----- 
From: Herb Kurlan 
Sent: Sep 4, 2015 7:02 PM 
To: blotch44026 at mypacks.net, General pattern discussion , Dan Underkofler ,
Jon Lowe 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2016/17 Advanced and Masters 

The committee knows that they can add in the option to do an in line
turnaround coming in or going out. They just are required to include 1 or 2
turnarounds with the only option to go cross box. They chose to make this
turnaround the one with out the option to go in line. The current masters
sequence has two cross box turnarounds without the in line option. 

 

Herb



-------- Original message --------
From: blotch44026--- via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

Date: 09/04/2015 3:45 PM (GMT-08:00) 
To: Dan Underkofler <underdw at gmail.com>, General pattern discussion
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>, Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com>, General
pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2016/17 Advanced and Masters 

The option for the inline maneuver on the tophat was fine, it just needs to
be changed to a full roll or no roll on the up-line allowing you to move
towards center as opposed to away from it. Moving away was the
impracticality of it. Its a nice option as it allows you to hold position if
you want or change position if you want by doing the cross-box, traditional
tophat. Not sure why you would want to remove the inline option completely
when a simple fix makes it very useful and practical. 

Rick Sweeney
   


-----Original Message-----
>From: Dan Underkofler via NSRCA-discussion
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>Sent: Sep 4, 2015 4:44 PM
>To: Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com>, General pattern discussion
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2016/17 Advanced and Masters
>
>+1!!!!!
>
>
>
>> On Sep 4, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Jon Lowe via NSRCA-discussion
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>> 
>> PLEASE put the inline option back in the tophat. There IS enough room to
do it if you keep the cobra at a reasonable size.  There is no good reason
to take it out.
>> 
>> Jon
>> 
>>> On Sep 4, 2015 11:35 AM, Dale Olstinske via NSRCA-discussion
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> The Sequence Committee considered all input from the membership recieved
since we sent out our recommendation last spring. We have decided to leave
Advanced proposal as is, but made some changes to Masters. Both are posted
to the web site. The Masters changes are as follows all based on membership
input: 
>>> 
>>> 1. The two down wind stall turns #9 and #13 were very similar in design.
We modified the second one (#13), to a Stall Turn with a 3/4 roll, 1/4 roll
down. 
>>> 2. The Top Hat turnaround, #15 had an inline option which was not
practical. Since we did not have any forced cross box turnaround (only
optional) we decided to make to eliminate the in line option. It is now a
Top Hat with 3 of 4 up, 1/4 roll down. 
>>> 3. We have dropped the requirement for immediate roll reversal. All roll
reversals may have a pause, BUT it is not required. Anyone wishing to do
immediate reversal, like FAI, may do so. This has been in our sequence
descriptions  for the past few years, so no change. 
>>> 
>>> The BOD will be voting on these sequences next week. If approved, we
will soon create the Aresti and Power Point for both of these. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks, 
>>> 
>>> Dale 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 12205 (20150904) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 12205 (20150904) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 12205 (20150904) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20150905/bb7b5ad5/attachment.html>