[NSRCA-discussion] 2016/17 Advanced and Masters
john tarpinian
jtarpinian at yahoo.com
Fri Sep 4 09:57:52 AKDT 2015
I don't understand the reasoning behind a forced cross box maneuver. If you're 150m out it forces you out to 175m and beyond or come in and get squeezed. It sort of penalizes you for holding the 150m line.
John
On Friday, September 4, 2015 12:35 PM, Dale Olstinske via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
The Sequence Committee considered all input from the membership recieved since we sent out our recommendation last spring. We have decided to leave Advanced proposal as is, but made some changes to Masters. Both are posted to the web site. The Masters changes are as follows all based on membership input:
1. The two down wind stall turns #9 and #13 were very similar in design. We modified the second one (#13), to a Stall Turn with a 3/4 roll, 1/4 roll down.
2. The Top Hat turnaround, #15 had an inline option which was not practical. Since we did not have any forced cross box turnaround (only optional) we decided to make to eliminate the in line option. It is now a Top Hat with 3 of 4 up, 1/4 roll down.
3. We have dropped the requirement for immediate roll reversal. All roll reversals may have a pause, BUT it is not required. Anyone wishing to do immediate reversal, like FAI, may do so. This has been in our sequence descriptions for the past few years, so no change.
The BOD will be voting on these sequences next week. If approved, we will soon create the Aresti and Power Point for both of these.
Thanks,
Dale
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20150904/643a24fa/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list