[NSRCA-discussion] How High Can Drones Fly

[Phil S.]

Yeah, John, including US!!!

Phil Spelt, KCRC Emeritus, Secretary
AMA 1294 Scientific Leader Member
SPA L-18, Board Member
(865)435-1476v, (865)604-0541c


On 2/12/2015 11:22 AM, John Fuqua via NSRCA-discussion wrote:
>
> Problem is the FAA will beat all people into submission regardless.
>
> *From:* NSRCA-discussion 
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] *On Behalf Of *John 
> Pavlick via NSRCA-discussion
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:30 PM
> *To:* 'General pattern discussion'
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] How High Can Drones Fly
>
> Oh, you may not be able to REGULATE stupid people but you CAN beat 
> them into submission! LOL
>
> John Pavlick
>
> Cell: 203-417-4971
>
> idslogo2
>
> Integrated Development Services
>
> *From:* NSRCA-discussion 
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] *On Behalf Of *John 
> Fuqua via NSRCA-discussion
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 11, 2015 6:27 PM
> *To:* 'General pattern discussion'
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] How High Can Drones Fly
>
> You cannot regulate stupid people !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   But the FAA will 
> try anyway !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> *From:* NSRCA-discussion 
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] *On Behalf Of *John 
> Pavlick via NSRCA-discussion
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:46 AM
> *To:* 'General pattern discussion'
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] How High Can Drones Fly
>
> And THIS is the reason why "laws" are ineffective. While all of this 
> B.S. is going on, there are "law-abiding" AMA members working with the 
> FAA to create legislation, reporting their flying sight GPS 
> coordinates to the FAA, having their yearly "talk" with the FBI (as a 
> club president I have to talk to an FBI agent and report that I 
> haven't seen ANY type of "suspicious" activity at my flying field 
> during the year). Limiting their flight ceiling, observing NOTAMs, not 
> flying when the airspace is restricted, etc, etc. Laws only affect the 
> people who are honest and would probably not cause any trouble anyway 
> because they have COMMON SENSE. Meanwhile ignorant idiots just do 
> whatever they want to -- regardless of "laws" and "restrictions". 
>  Without enforcement, laws are almost meaningless. Let's NOT talk 
> about gun laws -- but the same thing applies. Sad but true.
>
> John Pavlick
>
> Cell: 203-417-4971
>
> idslogo2
>
> Integrated Development Services
>
> *From:* NSRCA-discussion 
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] *On Behalf Of 
> *Bill's Email via NSRCA-discussion
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:33 AM
> *To:* General pattern discussion
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] How High Can Drones Fly
>
> It is very common for smaller UAS opertors, like those who operate the 
> DJI Phantom quads, to illegally modify their antennas in order to fly 
> at greater distances and alitudes than the stock equipment would 
> allow. A company named "Flytrex" gives them that ability to log their 
> flights and post on line for "awards".
>
> 4,000 feet is entirely possible and almost commonplace for many of 
> these idiots.
>
> http://www.flytrex.com/challenges/distance/
>
> Bill
>
>
> On 2/11/15 4:32 AM, Ron Hansen via NSRCA-discussion wrote:
>
>     I just saw a commercial on Fox News promoting an upcoming Gretchen
>     Carlson show where she asks the question why do drones fly as high
>     as 5000 ft?
>
>     I wouldn't think the run of the mill quad copter could fly that
>     high but I have no idea.
>
>     Not to mention you couldn't see it at that height.
>
>     Food for thought.
>
>     Thanks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20150212/6b0aef14/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 735 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20150212/6b0aef14/attachment.png>