[NSRCA-discussion] FAA Registration begins December 21

Scott McHarg scmcharg at gmail.com
Tue Dec 15 10:48:45 AKST 2015 

Dana,

I'm only asking because, in reality, it's rhetorical because it cannot be
answered.  If the FAA is requiring us to register and not our models, what
good does a from the factory pre-registered model do?

Honestly, it really doesn't matter, it's more of a curiosity thing for me
while I sit back and look at the FAA and shake my head.  I 100% agree with
Mark Atwood and Peter in the fact that we must stay with the AMA and fight
the battle through the paths that government allows.  I shake my head
because they are reacting to public pressure for a documented 238 calls on
potentially unsafe UAS flights while they estimate over 200,000 sUAS may
exist in the U.S in 2014.  Not.one.single.documented.accident/incursion.

I know very well the problem isn't with the people that are currently
discussing it.  It's the people that have no idea what's going on, how to
operate in the NAS, and quite simply, don't care as well as the media
feeding on this little frenzy.  It's the folks that go "teach themselves"
after buying a product that actually flies in the mall or online and goes
to the local dirt  field to try it out.  If we show that we are big boys
and can behave as we have as an organization for decades and stand behind
the AMA regardless of how we feel about how much or little they do, we will
be in the right and have nothing to worry about.  The FAA could have put a
height restriction on us or a distance restriction or any thing else
related to public safety.  They didn't.  They gave us a few
recommendations.  Maybe this is the first foot in the door to more
regulation but if we simply do nothing or try to do it as an individual by
quitting to show them what's up, we will have failed.  We have to do this
united.

Scott

*Scott A. McHarg*
VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot
Texas A&M University
PPL - ASEL

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Scott McHarg <scmcharg at gmail.com> wrote:

> Sure but you do realize the compliance dates, right?
>
> December 21, 2015 • Any small unmanned aircraft to be used exclusively as
> model aircraft that have never been operated. • Small unmanned aircraft to
> be used in authorized operations as other than model aircraft continue to
> use part 47 registration process.
>
>  February 19, 2016 • Small unmanned aircraft to be used exclusively as
> model aircraft and have been operated by their owner prior to December 21,
> 2015.
>
> March 31, 2016 • Small unmanned aircraft to be used in authorized
> operations other than as model aircraft continue to use part 47
> registration process or use part 48 process. § 48.5
>
> Essentially, they're saying if it has never flown prior to Dec. 21, it has
> to be registered prior to flying it.  How exactly are they going to
> pre-register models with zero time frame not to mention all those recently
> sold for the holidays?
>
> *Scott A. McHarg*
> VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot
> Texas A&M University
> PPL - ASEL
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Dana Beaton <danamaenia at me.com> wrote:
>
>> No, not FAA, lawyers will advise manufactures, importers, resellers, etc.
>> to limit their liability by including registration information as part of
>> their business processes, so that the end user would be informed.  A
>> product liability warning, like all the paper that comes with new power
>> tools or lawn mowers.
>>
>>
>> On Dec 15, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Scott McHarg via NSRCA-discussion <
>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>
>> So, you think the FAA is going to "make" all of the factories in China,
>> Thailand, and Singapore comply with their rule?  Me thinks not.
>>
>> *Scott A. McHarg*
>> VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot
>> Texas A&M University
>> PPL - ASEL
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Peter Vogel <vogel.peter at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The FAA also mentions "pre-registered" aircraft.  I believe that the
>>> manufacturers will be pre-registering aircraft to their customers, but I
>>> could be wrong.
>>>
>>> Peter+
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:33 AM, DaveL322 via NSRCA-discussion <
>>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> To limit liability, all manufacturers, retailers, and clubs will have
>>>> to include the new regs with every vehicle and every membership
>>>> sold/offered.  And of course the rogues that have caused the problems and
>>>> will continue to cause the problems will not register.
>>>>
>>>> It is the camels nose in the tent, it is the slippery slope, it is yet
>>>> again another unelected bureaucratic over reach that will accomplish little
>>>> or nothing other than grow wasteful government and degrade personal
>>>> liberty.  It will be a tool used by the FAA to characterize all modelers as
>>>> irresponsible operators causing the problems, and we (the vast majority)
>>>> will be subject to ever increasingly restrictive (and uneffective)
>>>> egulations targeted to control the tiny minority.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>> Please pardon any spelling errors or brevity.....Sent on a Sprint
>>>> Samsung Galaxy Note® 3
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------- Original message --------
>>>> From: Scott McHarg via NSRCA-discussion <
>>>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>>> Date: 12/15/2015 13:05 (GMT-05:00)
>>>> To: James Hiller <jnhiller at earthlink.net>, General pattern discussion <
>>>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] FAA Registration begins December 21
>>>>
>>>> My question is.....
>>>>
>>>> Since the FAA has no ability to put something in place at the point of
>>>> sale and since the FAA cannot make a law and only a rule, how are they
>>>> going to let all the Best Buy / Radio Shack / Walmart / online store buyers
>>>> know that they must register?  There are going to be so many new operators
>>>> out there that have no idea this is happening.  I heard a ridiculous number
>>>> of the amount of these toys being sold just this Christmas season.  They
>>>> obviously did not think this through.  Announcement and implementation all
>>>> in one week.  That's the fastest I've ever seen a bureaucracy work even if
>>>> it did benefit them.
>>>>
>>>> *Scott A. McHarg*
>>>> VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot
>>>> Texas A&M University
>>>> PPL - ASEL
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:56 AM, James Hiller via NSRCA-discussion <
>>>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone really believe an outlaw operator is going to put a number
>>>>> on their toy of choice?
>>>>>
>>>>> Jim
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* NSRCA-discussion [mailto:
>>>>> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] *On Behalf Of *Ed Alt via
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion
>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 15, 2015 9:15 AM
>>>>> *To:* Dana Beaton
>>>>> *Cc:* John Ford; General pattern discussion
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] FAA Registration begins December 21
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dana
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The identity theft risk with the FAA number is that if someone places
>>>>> your number on their model and causes property damage or injuries or worse,
>>>>> then the FAA and law enforcement are coming down on your head.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 15, 2015, at 8:34 AM, Dana Beaton <danamaenia at me.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Ed, Andy and I joined Buc-Le in Quakertown this week since Farview
>>>>> closed (due to excess turbine traffic outraging the neighbors, having
>>>>> nothing to do with drones or nefarious non-members).  Buc-Le requires that
>>>>> club membership cards, or AMA cards for guests, be placed on the board
>>>>> while we fly.  Many clubs have a system like this.  The LVRCS still does,
>>>>> but we now permit members to wear their membership cards if they don’t want
>>>>> to use the board.  Someone who wants to borrow an identity, copy or steal
>>>>> an AMA card, can just stroll up to the box: No need for someone to help one
>>>>> of us find parts to a downed model, it’s that simple today to grab a name
>>>>> and number of someone who is reputable in the hobby to hide behind.  I have
>>>>> not heard of this happeningso it seems so unlikely, even now with
>>>>> registration coming down the pike.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In the coming compliance environment, the new normal for AMA members,
>>>>> what may mar our hobby is reputable hobbyist pilots NOT registering?  I get
>>>>> that a lot of us are angry at what has transpired, but let’s think through
>>>>> the more probable scenarios and avoid needless troubles for ourselves and
>>>>> clubs.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Decades ago when I was training for my Private Pilot ticket we still
>>>>> had the large registration numbers, N numbers, on general aviation planes.
>>>>> Every instructor had stories about the one little old lady who called the
>>>>> police every time she saw a low flying aircraft overhead.  While the pilot
>>>>> in question may have been in fact at a legal altitude/separation per the
>>>>> FARs, that did not stop those nuisance calls.  When the police came to ask
>>>>> around in these stories, nothing ever came of the complaints as the pilots,
>>>>> operators, etc. all had their documents in order and were flying
>>>>> responsibly.  Just crank calls that burdened the cops, resulting no
>>>>> problems for the flight school.  What I am getting at is if and when our
>>>>> neighbor calls around about activity at our clubs, should the locals come
>>>>> around asking, we will have all our documents in order.  If asked, like
>>>>> John suggests, we can produce registration.  End of story.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> OTOH, if neighbors complain and local authorities cannot establish
>>>>> that club members are operating within guidelines, there could be more
>>>>> questions than the situation would otherwise merit.  That is the more
>>>>> likely scenario in my mind than bad actors stealing my identity to fly
>>>>> drones badly.  We might want to worry more about the mundane stuff like
>>>>> that than the more elaborate scenarios?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Respectfully/anonymously (LOL),
>>>>>
>>>>> Dana
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 15, 2015, at 8:01 AM, Ed Alt via NSRCA-discussion <
>>>>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That should work for the most part.  Don't ever let anyone help you
>>>>> look for a lost/crashed model I guess.  There are still complications for
>>>>> various scenarios, such as for anyone who wants to teach a student to fly
>>>>> etc.
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> From: jsf106 at gmail.com
>>>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] FAA Registration begins December 21
>>>>> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 07:37:04 -0500
>>>>> CC: ed_alt at hotmail.com
>>>>> To: mark.grabowski at comcast.net; nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>>
>>>>> On my plane, the number will be accessible without tools, per the
>>>>> rule, but unless asked by an FAA official, I'm not offering to show where
>>>>> it is to anyone.
>>>>>
>>>>> I need to have my registration with me, and I will, but no one gets to
>>>>> see it. As the rule says, this is between me and the FAA.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Not up to the clubs or the AMA to police individuals on behalf of the
>>>>> FAA, so identity theft should not be a problem.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> John
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 15, 2015, at 7:12 AM, Comcast via NSRCA-discussion <
>>>>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Been thinking the very same thing. Someone steals a user number, does
>>>>> something stupid and then there's a knock at my door. Without a great alibi
>>>>> what are you gonna do???
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 15, 2015, at 5:23 AM, Ed Alt via NSRCA-discussion <
>>>>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Speaking of use cases, perhaps I missed it in the flurry of emails
>>>>> yesterday, but has anyone thought about the identity theft risk that the
>>>>> FAA is creating?  By registering the pilot and not having unique
>>>>> identification numbers for each model that are assigned to an owner, it
>>>>> sets up the scenario for anyone else to use your number on their model and
>>>>> cause virtually unlimited problems for you, anywhere, anytime.  To help
>>>>> reduce this risk, at the very least, the numbers would have to be provided
>>>>> by the FAA with some sort of marking, holography, whatever to at least
>>>>> raise the difficulty of identity theft from zero to something above zero.
>>>>> You can apparently use a felt marker to scribble your own numbers as it
>>>>> stands now.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Better yet, from an identity theft perspective at least, there should
>>>>> be unique numbers for each model provided to the owner.  This, of course
>>>>> would drive costs way up and incur delays.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We should put the central planners in charge of every aspect of our
>>>>> lives now, should we not?  They've really shown their true colors on this
>>>>> one.  Incompetent boobs, every last one of them.
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:53:22 -0800
>>>>> To: acornacchione at hotmail.com; nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] FAA Registration begins December 21
>>>>> From: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>>
>>>>> Honestly, I think thats one of the use-cases the FAA didn't think
>>>>> through real well...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My belief is that this whole thing is about creating a sense of
>>>>> accountability for the "rogue" users (I'm not willing to give them the term
>>>>> pilot because they don't deserve it) who do stupid shit like flying around
>>>>> a wildfire and preventing Calfire airborne response for 20+ minutes, etc.
>>>>> It's about dealing with the anti-AMA guys who fly 120+mph EDFs weighing 6+
>>>>> lbs over an active soccer game at a local park, it's about dealing with the
>>>>> dipshits who fly their drone on the takeoff/approach path of an active full
>>>>> scale airport in hopes of "cool footage".  The AMA field flyers are the
>>>>> least of the FAA's worries and we're blowing it out of proportion.  Yes,
>>>>> it's a stupid regulation, but let's comply where we can and show ourselves
>>>>> to be the responsible modelers the AMA says we are.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For the foreign guys, first of all, sorry for the needless red tape
>>>>> (though I think a similar thing is coming for the BMFA guys in the UK and
>>>>> it would not surprise me to see a more sensible version of this from the
>>>>> Canadian guys).  But if I were CD'ing a contest and some guys came down
>>>>> from the Great White North, I'd happily hook them up with some temporary
>>>>> form of my own registration # to put in their planes for the purposes of
>>>>> flying at the contest because I know them to be responsible pilots.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter+
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Anthony Cornacchione via
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Legit question with an unknown answer:  how will this impact
>>>>> international (IMAC Worlds in Muncie 2018) NATS with international
>>>>> competitors (NATS News this year had a nice write up) and our local
>>>>> contests which have had the occasional Canadian wander south?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 14, 2015, at 6:33 PM, Dana Beaton via NSRCA-discussion <
>>>>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Boaters register their pleasure craft, fishermen & hunters buy
>>>>> licenses, some folks even register their firearms! So what? Are we going to
>>>>> give up our hobby just because of a tiny pice of red tape? Nope! Just keep
>>>>> flying. The bad actors who misuse their aircraft will run afoul local
>>>>> authorities sure enough, that's their problem, not ours.  We need to
>>>>> continue to set the good example though our good flying.  Good flying will
>>>>> carry the day.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 14, 2015, at 6:25 PM, Dave Burton via NSRCA-discussion <
>>>>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> So, just shut up and drink the Kool-Aid?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* NSRCA-discussion [
>>>>> mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>] *On Behalf Of *Derek
>>>>> Koopowitz via NSRCA-discussion
>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, December 14, 2015 6:15 PM
>>>>> *To:* Atwood, Mark; General pattern discussion
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] FAA Registration begins December 21
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep.... yep... yep.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Atwood, Mark via NSRCA-discussion <
>>>>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hasn’t that private information ship already sailed?  We all register
>>>>> cars and think nothing of it.  Heck, we even took classes, got educated,
>>>>> and were tested for a license before we could own or operate a car and we
>>>>> have to renew that every four years and prove we’re still physically
>>>>> capable (minimal proof admittedly).  Personally not sure a gun should be
>>>>> much different but don’t want to start that discussion (especially since
>>>>> I’m generally pro gun…just not pro redneck hill jack survivalist conspiracy
>>>>> theorist) but not registering to fly airplanes?  Really?    We trade more
>>>>> info internationally downloading a Facebook app.    Also, we’re already
>>>>> registered… just with the AMA, not the USA.  And yes, the AMA is trying to
>>>>> make that our ONLY registration, but that’s just a proposal at this point.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Guys… we already do ALL of this.  Our AMA # is on the plane, we follow
>>>>> safety rules, blah blah blah.  This is a very minor inconvenience and if
>>>>> the AMA proposal to use our AMA# for our registration number it won’t even
>>>>> be that.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 14, 2015, at 5:15 PM, Dave Burton via NSRCA-discussion <
>>>>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Now is the time for massive civil disobedience!
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think I'd register my planes any more than I'd register my
>>>>> guns.
>>>>>
>>>>> Too bad AMA has no clout like the NRA.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dave
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* NSRCA-discussion [
>>>>> mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>] *On Behalf Of *Robert L.
>>>>> Beaubien via NSRCA-discussion
>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, December 14, 2015 1:23 PM
>>>>> *To:* Scott McHarg; General pattern discussion
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] FAA Registration begins December 21
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Morons at work….
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -           Robert Beaubien
>>>>>
>>>>> -           DronePlastics.com <http://droneplastics.com/>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> “Dear Algebra, Please stop asking us to find your X.  She's never
>>>>> coming back and don't ask Y.”
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* NSRCA-discussion [
>>>>> mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>] *On Behalf Of *Scott
>>>>> McHarg via NSRCA-discussion
>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, December 14, 2015 11:05 AM
>>>>> *To:* General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>>>> *Subject:* [NSRCA-discussion] FAA Registration begins December 21
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, here it is boys and girls.  It's official and starts next
>>>>> Monday.  The link is for the FAQ's of what's happening.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  You only have to register once and you don't have to individually
>>>>> register all of your models.
>>>>>
>>>>> You must be able to provide proof of registration and have it on you
>>>>> when flying.
>>>>>
>>>>> You must have your Registration # (not going to be a N number) in your
>>>>> airplane where it is legible and accessible without the use of tools (aka
>>>>> under your canopy).
>>>>>
>>>>> If you sell a model, you should update your records. (I don't
>>>>> completely understand this if we aren't registering all of our models
>>>>> individually but, OK)
>>>>>
>>>>> Registration is $5 but you'll get that back if you register in the
>>>>> first 30 days, I believe.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Have a look at the link and prepare to be upset.....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.faa.gov/uas/registration/faqs/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Scott A. McHarg*
>>>>>
>>>>> VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot
>>>>>
>>>>> Texas A&M University
>>>>>
>>>>> PPL - ASEL
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> No virus found in this message.
>>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>>> Version: 2015.0.6176 / Virus Database: 4483/11173 - Release Date:
>>>>> 12/13/15
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> No virus found in this message.
>>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>>> Version: 2015.0.6176 / Virus Database: 4483/11173 - Release Date:
>>>>> 12/13/15
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Director, Fixed Wing Flight Training
>>>>>
>>>>> Santa Clara County Model Aircraft Skypark
>>>>>
>>>>> Associate Vice President, Academy of Model Aeronautics District X
>>>>>
>>>>> Treasurer, National Society of Radio Control Aerobatics (NSRCA)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion
>>>>> mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Director, Fixed Wing Flight Training
>>> Santa Clara County Model Aircraft Skypark
>>> Associate Vice President, Academy of Model Aeronautics District X
>>> Treasurer, National Society of Radio Control Aerobatics (NSRCA)
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20151215/cbd47e5d/attachment.html>

More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list