[NSRCA-discussion] Message not going through

Keith Hoard klhoard at hotmail.com
Tue Apr 21 08:35:16 AKDT 2015


Well, every airplane / rocket / balloon / glider / thrown rock is a design
compromise.  

.

Just ask RVP about the trade-offs they made when writing the specs for dirt.

 

From: Del R [mailto:drykert2 at rochester.rr.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 11:09 AM
To: Keith Hoard
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Message not going through

 

Boy ~~ that is so VERY true Keith.. My Dad was x-Air Force and took me up
once while I was learning, before my solo, and asked me to shoot some touch
and goes.  He instilled in me when I cut the power to always know you have
the threshold made. To bad the big jobs can't do that.. lol..

----- Original Message ----- 

From:  <mailto:klhoard at hotmail.com> Keith Hoard 

To:  <mailto:drykert2 at rochester.rr.com> 'Del R' ;
<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 'General pattern discussion' 

Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 11:41 AM

Subject: RE: [NSRCA-discussion] Message not going through

 

That's funny, I'll have to try it sometime. . . 

 

I guess that (heading statement) would be a true if you were laying on your
side . . .  

 

Yeah, folks say funny things while learning since they are still
experiencing "tunnel vision".  It's actually a very precarious time as an
instructor since you can either install a very solid bedrock of knowledge or
a lifetime of bad habits. . 

 

From: NSRCA-discussion [ <mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>
mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Del R via
NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 10:36 AM
To: Ronald Van Putte; General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Message not going through

 

isn't dat like when the 1st officer says to retract your flaps and de
co-almost pilot moves his elbows closer to his body?

 

I do remember my instructor sharing a story he once asked a student what his
heading was and his response was "were climbing".  They had not soloed and
my guess they might need a few more hours to taxi by themselves. 

----- Original Message ----- 

From:  <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> Ronald Van Putte via
NSRCA-discussion 

To:  <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> General pattern discussion 

Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 11:06 AM

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Message not going through

 

What do hats have to do with e-mail?   

 

Oh, CAPS means in capital letters?  Never mind. 

 

 

On Apr 21, 2015, at 9:43 AM, Keith Hoard via NSRCA-discussion
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> wrote:

 

Nope, try again.  This time in all CAPS.

 

From: NSRCA-discussion [ <mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>
mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Bob Kane via
NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 6:04 AM
To: General Pattern Discussion
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Message not going through

I have sent two emails to the list and they do not appear to getting
through.  How about this one?

Bob Kane
 <mailto:getterflash at yahoo.com> getterflash at yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
 <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
 <http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

 

  _____  

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20150421/c98c7790/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list