[NSRCA-discussion] FW: Resistance and retirement

Fri Nov 14 17:56:19 AKST 2014

I know I am late to the discussion,  but if your spell check turned "pack"
into "back", be carefull about what it does with "EDF". You may have to see
Alice.
On Nov 13, 2014 11:45 AM, "Ed White via NSRCA-discussion" <
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> Yes you can monitor IR under discharge conditions.  First I'll tell you
> how, then I'll offer an opinion on why it's probably not worth the effort.
> You calculate IR of a cell as cell voltage divided by current.  So put a
> cell meter on the battery that displays voltage of each cell and do a
> ground run up with your watt meter.  Record the cell voltages and the
> current and calculate the IR's.  IR's under 20 or 30C discharge will likely
> be quite different than under 1C charge (what your charger tells you) and
> the IR's will change as the battery heats up and discharges.  So I'm not
> sure what all this will tell you other than which cells are bad, and you
> don't need IR to tell you that. Bad cell(s) will sag in voltage (which will
> make them look like low IR even though this is not a good thing).
>
> The only use for this that I can think of is if you plan on trying to
> replace bad cells in the pack.  That's doable but generally not worth the
> trouble.  I've done that once, on a new pack where I screwed up and
> discharged 2 cells in a 5 cell pack (left a cell meter plugged in for 2
> weeks).  I wouldn't go to the trouble for a used pack since most likely the
> next weakest cell will soon need replacing and you'll just end up chasing
> your tail replacing cells.  Better to just get a new pack.
>
> Ed
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Michael Cohen via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
>> Ooops, I actual meant to send this e-mail to the group!
>>
>> Mike C
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> From: precisionaero at hotmail.com
>> To: vincebrc at gmail.com
>> Subject: RE: [NSRCA-discussion] Resistance and retirement
>> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:07:30 -0700
>>
>> The issue I am having is with some packs I use for an EDF. Under the
>> "load" of takeoff, two of the three packs I use noticeably sag.  I took off
>> after the sag the first time and was able to make it around  for a landing,
>> but I don't think I took a breath the whole time.  I topped off the packs
>> and ran them on the ground and could hear the sag then too.  I did not hook
>> up my watt meter in line because the watt meter has Deans connectors and
>> the EDF has 5.5mm bullets.  I did cycle both packs on the chargers and they
>> had about 3 to 4 mOhm resistance on 5 of the 6 cells with one pack having a
>> 6 mOhm resistance and the other 12.5 mOhm resistance on an individual
>> cell.  I guess I am surprised the higher resistance on one particular cell
>> could cause a problem, but I know the EDF systems hit the batteries really
>> hard.  Any thoughts on why I am seeing an issue?  Is it related to the
>> higher resistance?  Is there some device out there that tests individual
>> cells under a discharge load?
>>
>> Mike C
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:02:18 -0600
>> To: chuenkan at comcast.net; nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Resistance and retirement
>> From: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>
>>
>> I use TP.  The IR is usually around 2-3 when new.  I usually use them for
>> practice and contest until around IR gets around 5.  Over 5 I start to feel
>> the power loss and I don't use those anymore.  I don't like to take the
>> smoke risk.  In general, I get around 80-100 cycles.
>>
>> Vicente "Vince" Bortone
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Phil S. via NSRCA-discussion <
>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>
>>  Yes, Dan, these things work on the Smooke Principle -- if you let the
>> white smoke out, they quit working...
>>
>> Phil Spelt, KCRC Emeritus, Secretary
>> AMA 1294 Scientific Leader Member
>> SPA L-18, Board Member
>> (865)435-1476v, (865)604-0541c
>>
>>
>> On 11/9/2014 5:47 PM, Dan Curtis via NSRCA-discussion wrote:
>>
>>  Ah, flag, that is where I was making my mistake.  I thought it was
>> white smoke.
>>
>>  Dan
>>
>>
>>    On Sunday, November 9, 2014 4:42 PM, Ed White via NSRCA-discussion
>> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>   I don't go by IR differences. I eventually reach a point that in a
>> practice flight I pull up for the last maneuver in the sequence and the
>> battery puts up a little white flag and says, "not gonna happen".  Then I
>> retire the pack.
>>
>> Ed
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Michael Cohen via NSRCA-discussion <
>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>
>>  Is there any rule of thumb for how much difference between individual
>> cell resistances is OK before a back should be retired?
>>
>>  Regards,
>> Mike C
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing listNSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.orghttp://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing
>> list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20141115/91d3e979/attachment.html>