[NSRCA-discussion] FAA Rules

[Robert L. Beaubien]

Actually it is 303m or 994 ft at 175m.


-           Robert Beaubien
-           Sr. Software Architect
-           Kool Software LLC

"No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced."

From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Duane Beck via NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 11:29 AM
To: Patrick Harris; General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] FAA Rules

Top of a 60 degree box at 175 meters out is almost 500'

Duane

________________________________
From: "Patrick Harris via NSRCA-discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
To: "Peter Vogel" <vogel.peter at gmail.com<mailto:vogel.peter at gmail.com>>, "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 2:20:47 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] FAA Rules

The IMAC boys will have a cow over the 400 foot rule.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20140624/39706f6e/attachment.html>