[NSRCA-discussion] Proposed 2015 sequences

[Jarvis Johnson]

People people, stop your crying, there is nothing wrong with the 2015 proposed sequences.We want it to easy,it time to step it up, so go out there and fly !!!!!!!!


On Monday, July 28, 2014 6:21 AM, james woodward via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
 


Did anyone see the 2014 Nats F3A Finals Unknowns?  Insanity!!  LOL.   
Jim



On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Del R via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

 
>While I do not dispute your thoughts 
and writing Mark do you accept and realize that this also drives the casual and 
medium dollar pilot backwards or away?  As long as you accept that is part 
of what drives people away from being able to compete then you are also a 
realist. 
> 
>    Del 
>        
x nsrca 473 
>----- Original Message ----- 
>>From: Atwood, Mark via  NSRCA-discussion 
>>To: NSRCA General 
>>Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2014 9:11 PM
>>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposed  2015 sequences
>>
>>
>>Integrated rolling maneuvers were only introduced to FAI in the last 10  years.  Over that time Masters has stayed fairly stagnant with regard to  any type of new maneuver or difficulty.  I was flying masters when they  introduced 2 rolls in opposite directions and we all had a similar thought… “I  have to roll the OTHER way???  This isn’t FAI….”   We adjusted.   
>>
>>
>>The gap between Masters and FAI is growing rapidly.  If we want  Masters to prepare pilots for FAI than we need to keep the gap reasonable.   Yes, Masters is a destination for some.  So is Advanced…heck, so is  Intermediate.  But that doesn’t change their primary purpose of being  stepping stones to improve our flying, culminating with FAI. 
>>
>>
>>
>>Mark Atwood                                                                        
>>Paragon Consulting, 
  Inc.  |  President            
                      
   
>>5885 Landerbrook Drive Suite 130, Cleveland Ohio, 44124    
                  
      
>>Direct: 440.229.2502 |  Fax: 
  440.684.3102             
    
>>www.paragon-inc.com                                                                                
>>                
                        
                        
                        
                      
          
>>
>>        
>>
>>On Jul 27, 2014, at 8:42 PM, Whodaddy Whodaddy via 
  NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  wrote:
>>
>>
>>Several masters pilots at the NATS indicated they would 
  return to advanced because of the roller...It was indicated that who cares how 
  easy it might be masters is not FAI .. 
>>
>>An hour glass in advanced 
  seemed a bit much for that class imo..
>>Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>>On Jul 27, 2014, at 10:07 AM, Dale Olstinske via  NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  wrote:
>>>
>>>We would be asking for final BOD approval in 
    Oct.
>>>
>>>Dale
>>>
>>>
>>>On Jul 27, 2014, at 8:05 AM, Chuck Hochhalter via  NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>When will these be approved?
>>>>
>>>>Chuck
>>>>
>>>>Sent from 
      my 
      iPhone
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>NSRCA-discussion 
      mailing list
>>>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>NSRCA-discussion 
    mailing list
>>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>_______________________________________________
>>NSRCA-discussion 
  mailing list
>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>NSRCA-discussion 
  mailing 
  list
>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20140728/6a14f963/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6692 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20140728/6a14f963/attachment.png>