[NSRCA-discussion] Osiris 47 inch wings needed

Wed Feb 5 07:17:21 AKST 2014

A single color covering, preferably white, is a good thing. It allows the users to easily “customize” their planes just by adding trim.

Jay Marshall

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Jesky
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 9:44 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Osiris 47 inch wings needed

Most factories now a days don't really offer arcs as the chances of damage is much higher to the models as the open bay structures required to keep the weight down on the models really take a beating. Best case the factories will do single color covering which does sell well unfortunately.

Andrew 
Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 5, 2014, at 7:24 AM, Matthew Finley <rcfin02 at msn.com> wrote:

Heres a thought...... With the ARF kits there is a lot of time and money in the covering process..... If they would go back to making more ARC kits or nearly finished kits, that may help in that matter. I personally don't mind paying a little extra for the covering to be done for me. For me to cover a kit like they do would take me about 4 months or more..... 

Matthew E. Finley

Key-Note Piano Tuning and Service
(614)272-2604 Business
(614)557-3846 Cell
Key_note_piano at yahoo.com

  _____  

Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:44:47 -0500
From: underdw at gmail.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Osiris 47 inch wings needed

The 62" Osiris has been key to rebuilding pattern participation in the entry level class in the last few years in my area (Colorado/ New Mexico).  It is important to be able to recommend a good flying plane that can be ready to fly for under $1000.  Can't understand why 3DHS is bailing on this plane.

Dan

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Andrew Jesky <andrewjesky at gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks guys for the good info, I really like the 47" Osiris as it has been said put together and throw on the car. The 62" is a tough size as I think it worked well for 5s5000's but pushed them hard. 6s5000's were a little big for it. I think maybe do another 5s size just a little smaller?

Andrew 

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 4, 2014, at 5:06 PM, Anthony Romano <anthonyr105 at hotmail.com> wrote:

Happy birthday Andrew!

Love to see what is lurking in your imagination. In winter I have been flying 47" stuff but would like to move up to 62" size. Plan on sharing 6s packs with my heli. 

Anthony

Sent from my iPad

On Feb 4, 2014, at 5:55 PM, "Andrew Jesky" <andrewjesky at gmail.com> wrote:

I have an idea of what I'd like to design as far as plane but what do you guys think of size for it?

Andrew 

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 4, 2014, at 3:52 PM, "Bill Harden" <flyinbill1 at bellsouth.net> wrote:

Yes, Andrew designs extremely well flying airplanes.  So I also hope he comes out with a pattern plane of his own.  That would be just wonderful.

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of kingconsulting
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 4:32 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Osiris 47 inch wings needed

I have the same model but no extra wings sorry. They are not carrying the 47" anymore. I also heard no more 62" version either. I bought some extra wheel pants for the 47 and glad I did.

I know Andrew Jesky is starting his own plane company not sure if that has something to do with it. I hope he comes out with a pattern plane of his own.

Robert King

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20140205/9a8efe78/attachment.html>