[NSRCA-discussion] Osiris 47 inch wings needed

ronlock at comcast.net ronlock at comcast.net
Wed Feb 5 05:56:12 AKST 2014



OK on the damage concern.  Then the option of an all  white would be nice. 

Ron Lockhart ----- Original Message -----


From: "Andrew Jesky" <andrewjesky at gmail.com> 
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 9:43:55 AM 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Osiris 47 inch wings needed 


Most factories now a days don't really offer arcs as the chances of damage is much higher to the models as the open bay structures required to keep the weight down on the models really take a beating. Best case the factories will do single color covering which does sell well unfortunately. 


Andrew  
Sent from my iPhone 

On Feb 5, 2014, at 7:24 AM, Matthew Finley < rcfin02 at msn.com > wrote: 





Heres a thought...... With the ARF kits there is a lot of time and money in the covering process..... If they would go back to making more ARC kits or nearly finished kits, that may help in that matter. I personally don't mind paying a little extra for the covering to be done for me. For me to cover a kit like they do would take me about 4 months or more..... 


Matthew E. Finley 

Key-Note Piano Tuning and Service 
(614)272-2604 Business 
(614)557-3846 Cell 
Key_note_piano at yahoo.com 





Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:44:47 -0500 
From: underdw at gmail.com 
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Osiris 47 inch wings needed 


The 62" Osiris has been key to rebuilding pattern participation in the entry level class in the last few years in my area (Colorado/ New Mexico).  It is important to be able to recommend a good flying plane that can be ready to fly for under $1000.  Can't understand why 3DHS is bailing on this plane. 


Dan 



On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Andrew Jesky < andrewjesky at gmail.com > wrote: 

<blockquote>


Thanks guys for the good info, I really like the 47" Osiris as it has been said put together and throw on the car. The 62" is a tough size as I think it worked well for 5s5000's but pushed them hard. 6s5000's were a little big for it. I think maybe do another 5s size just a little smaller? 


Andrew  

Sent from my iPhone 

On Feb 4, 2014, at 5:06 PM, Anthony Romano < anthonyr105 at hotmail.com > wrote: 


<blockquote>


Happy birthday Andrew! 
Love to see what is lurking in your imagination. In winter I have been flying 47" stuff but would like to move up to 62" size. Plan on sharing 6s packs with my heli.  


Anthony 

Sent from my iPad 

On Feb 4, 2014, at 5:55 PM, "Andrew Jesky" < andrewjesky at gmail.com > wrote: 


<blockquote>


I have an idea of what I'd like to design as far as plane but what do you guys think of size for it? 


Andrew  

Sent from my iPhone 

On Feb 4, 2014, at 3:52 PM, "Bill Harden" < flyinbill1 at bellsouth.net > wrote: 


<blockquote>




Yes, Andrew designs extremely well flying airplanes.  So I also hope he comes out with a pattern plane of his own.  That would be just wonderful. 

  



From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [ mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org ] On Behalf Of kingconsulting 
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 4:32 PM 
To: General pattern discussion 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Osiris 47 inch wings needed 

  

I have the same model but no extra wings sorry. They are not carrying the 47" anymore. I also heard no more 62" version either. I bought some extra wheel pants for the 47 and glad I did. 


  


I know Andrew Jesky is starting his own plane company not sure if that has something to do with it. I hope he comes out with a pattern plane of his own. 


  


Robert King 


  




  


<blockquote>

_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
</blockquote>

</blockquote>

<blockquote>

_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
</blockquote>

</blockquote>

<blockquote>

_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
</blockquote>

_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

</blockquote>


_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
</blockquote>

<blockquote>

_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
</blockquote>

_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20140205/4f0f089b/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list