[NSRCA-discussion] Osiris 47 inch wings needed
kingconsulting
kingconsulting at mac.com
Tue Feb 4 14:11:07 AKST 2014
2m one for sure. I like the idea of the smaller one as it got me into pattern but would think the 62-65" range would do well.
My first thought was a 110 size but I liked the idea of the 62 using 5s batteries so if you move to 2m you don't lose your investment.
My .02 from a new guy.
Robert King
On Feb 4, 2014, at 2:55 PM, Andrew Jesky <andrewjesky at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have an idea of what I'd like to design as far as plane but what do you guys think of size for it?
>
> Andrew
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Feb 4, 2014, at 3:52 PM, "Bill Harden" <flyinbill1 at bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>> Yes, Andrew designs extremely well flying airplanes. So I also hope he comes out with a pattern plane of his own. That would be just wonderful.
>>
>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of kingconsulting
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 4:32 PM
>> To: General pattern discussion
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Osiris 47 inch wings needed
>>
>> I have the same model but no extra wings sorry. They are not carrying the 47" anymore. I also heard no more 62" version either. I bought some extra wheel pants for the 47 and glad I did.
>>
>> I know Andrew Jesky is starting his own plane company not sure if that has something to do with it. I hope he comes out with a pattern plane of his own.
>>
>> Robert King
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20140204/772c9d33/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list