[NSRCA-discussion] 2015 Proposed Advanced Sequence

[Dale Olstinske]

Attached here, just in case

 

 

 

From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On
Behalf Of RJ Bohn via NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 12:04 PM
To: Jas; General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2015 Proposed Advanced Sequence

 

ALCON,

 

 I went to the site and found the same sequence as last week. I think.   Are
these .pdf files dated anywhere?  

 

Richard Bohn

 

 

On Aug 4, 2014, at 2:36 PM, Jas via NSRCA-discussion
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:





Dale,

 

I'm out at the field with one of our Advanced pilots and he likes the
changes. I'm going to fly through it once for him and then call it for him.
Updates later.

Sent from my iP


On Aug 4, 2014, at 12:24 PM, Dale Olstinske via NSRCA-discussion
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

Over that past few weeks, we have received a lot of input from the
membership about the Advanced sequence proposed for 2015. To everyone who
has, a big thanks, we really need this in order to develop sequences that
meet the expectations of the majority of the membership. I would add, it is
very helpful when these inputs are specific, not just "I don't like it".
Much of the criticism about this sequence was in two areas, difficulty and
new maneuvers, let me address each. 

 

The guide allows for new maneuvers to be created. The list of maneuvers in
the development guide is not meant to be exhaustive. Each time we develop
new schedules, new ones are created or borrowed from other disciplines, like
F3A or even do I dare say, IMAC LOL! In this proposed sequence, there are a
few maneuvers that were previously not in the catalog, like the Immelman
with full rolls, the Hour Glass or the Cobra as we defined. As along at
these are in line with class guidelines and it's felt they are appropriate,
they are added to the list of allowable maneuvers. Specifically, the Hour
Glass was added because we all felt it was appropriate, and a variant of
that maneuver is now in Masters and F3A-P. So as you will see, we left it
in.

 

As to difficulty, we had enough pilots indicate concern, that we took
another look. In doing so, we realized that we had exceeded some of the
boundaries set forth in the Advanced section. The guide has been a living
breathing document for the past few cycles, so we could have modified the
guide to allow for this sequence, but it was felt this was the wrong
approach. Now, for the next cycle, we will be recommending some changes to
the guide (for BOD approval) which would allow more flexibility, however for
now, we are modifying the sequence to adhere to the guidelines.
Specifically, there are only limited number of inverted entries and exits,
on turn around maneuvers, executed at a low altitude. You will see in the
new sequence, we simply added and removed rolls, which brought the number of
inverted sections in line. The basic structure and class of each maneuvers,
are really unchanged.

 

The new sequence is now posted on the NSRCA web site. Again a big thanks for
all who took the time to let us know.

 

Dale

Sequence Committee

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20140804/9e63b056/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 2015 Advanced Maneuver Descriptions and Downgrades-revised Aug 2014.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 36650 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20140804/9e63b056/attachment.bin>