[NSRCA-discussion] FW: From the Judges Chair
Peter Vogel
vogel.peter at gmail.com
Tue Apr 8 20:31:52 AKDT 2014
Point being, I think, that the radius variation deduction should apply in that case, but if the maneuver is centered as-flown with the variation in Radii, there is no deduction for an error in centering because the center of the as-flown maneuver was appropriately placed—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Derek Koopowitz <derekkoopowitz at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Yes, they are required
the 1st diagram shows the maneuver with an incorrect
> (large) 2nd radius.
>
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of George Kennie
> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 5:13 PM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] FW: From the Judges Chair
>
> Are not constant radii required ?
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Derek Koopowitz <derekkoopowitz at gmail.com
> <mailto:derekkoopowitz at gmail.com> > wrote:
> My apologies
I drew the exits on the wrong side
here are the corrected
> drawings:
>
>
>
>
> From: Derek Koopowitz [mailto:derekkoopowitz at gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 4:56 PM
> To: 'General pattern discussion'
> Subject: RE: [NSRCA-discussion] >From the Judges Chair
>
> John,
>
> One always has to take into account the entry/exit lines
its not defined
> on how long they are but that they must exist and if we take an entry and
> exit line length of 15 meters (for example) then the exit line of 15 meters
> starts when the ¾ loop is completed and hits the horizontal and the 15
> meters entry line starts (obviously) 15 meters before the radius is started.
> If thats the case then a tight entry radius was done and a large loop at
> the top was done, then where would the center be for judging purposes? If
> done correctly, yes, I do agree that the center of the maneuver should be
> reasonably close to the top of the loop. One shouldnt look at this
> maneuver for a center that will be consistent for each pilot. The center
> will be different it is the mid-point between the start and end.
>
> In the example below the horizontal lines are identical in length but with
> a small (tight) entry radius and a large loop where is the center? Check
> out the next picture
>
>
>
>
> Now look at this picture with the radii the same and with identical entry /
> exit line lengths
where is center?
>
>
> Hopefully this helps
>
> -Derek
>
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> <mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of John Gayer
> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 3:43 PM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] >From the Judges Chair
>
> Derek,
> The input radius of the first quarter loop is part of the maneuver and
> defines the radius of the 3/4 loop. If you initiate the 1/4 loop on the
> center pole, the center of the maneuver does not shift with radius size and
> is centered in the box. In other words,size doesn't matter.
> John
> On 4/8/2014 4:24 PM, Derek Koopowitz wrote:
> I dont think you can leave off the input radius because the input radius
> size will change where center is located.
>
>
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> <mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Jas S
> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 3:15 PM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] >From the Judges Chair
>
> I've always enjoyed that pattern had definition (centers, box...) and that's
> why I don't fly IMAC but once a year if at that.
> If the start of the 9 is at the bottom 1/4 loop (minus entry line),
> and the end is at the end of the 3/4 loop (minus the exit line),
> and the bottom and top radii are equal (as are the entry and exit lines),
> wouldn't the center be the start of the bottom loop/middle of roll/top of
> 3/4 loop/finish of 3/4 loop?
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Daniel Underkofler <underdw at gmail.com
> <mailto:underdw at gmail.com> > wrote:
> Thank you! My thoughts exactly
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 4:02 PM, John Gayer <jgghome at comcast.net
> <mailto:jgghome at comcast.net> > wrote:
> Derek,
> "Somewhere in the 3/4 loop portion" is awfully vague and unjudgeable. I
> could buy anywhere in the 3/4 loop portion but not somewhere.
> The center you are describing would appear to be affected somehow by the
> entry and exit lines of the maneuver as per your description in the March
> K-Factor. I don't see that. This maneuver(figure 9) could be described as a
> single loop with a straight vertical line between the first quadrant and the
> last three quadrants. What rolls occur do not affect that basic shape. That
> places the center of the maneuver at the initial pullup into a quarter loop
> just as it would for a simple loop. The apex of the 3/4 loop would also be
> on the centerline and so would the return to level flight at the exit.
> As far as the straight line entry and exit being somehow offset, I don't see
> that either. The entry line ends at the quarter loop pullup and exit line
> begins upon completion of the 3/4 loop. Those two points should form a
> vertical line. I see that as the maneuver centerline as well.
> It's certainly true that the aresti shows the wrong center and it is
> certainly true that the sub-committee chair has the last word but he should
> be using a better word than "somewhere".
> John
> On 4/8/2014 3:22 PM, Derek Koopowitz wrote:
> Anthony,
>
> This shouldnt be confusing at all
the center of the maneuver is the middle
> point between the start and end of the maneuver. How much more simple can
> it get? The statement that the middle should be somewhere in the ¾ loop
> portion is correct depending on the size of the ¾ loop which must match
> the radius of the ¼ loop from horizontal to vertical when the maneuver
> starts. That center portion will change for every pilot as each pilot will
> fly it differently.
>
> Your comment about many outside the US isnt accurate if they see it
> differently then they are incorrect. The clarification I got is straight
> from the F3 sub-committee chair
>
> -Derek
>
>
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> <mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Anthony
> Romano
> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:27 AM
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] From the Judges Chair
>
> Would love to see a review of maneuver 13 of the Finals sequence. In the
> March Kfactor the center was described as "should be the middle of the
> maneuver somewhere in the ¾ loop portion." While the many outside the US see
> it that the loop is centered and the Aresti in the latest FAI sporting code
> show the upline being centered.
>
> A bit confusing,
>
> Anthony
> _____
> Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 09:28:00 -0700
> From: joncarter60 at comcast.net <mailto:joncarter60 at comcast.net>
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] From the Judges Chair
> Hey guys - we got an excellent suggestion from the group for last month's
> article so I thought I would ask again! Anyone have a burning maneuver or
> judging question? Just let me know.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jon Carter
> Judging Committee Chairman
>
>
>
> Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
> _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing
> list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> --
> Jason
> http://jasonshangar.weebly.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20140409/2f10973c/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list