[NSRCA-discussion] nsrca shutdown???

[Phil S.]

Well, Dave, the essential salaries of our "congressmen" would NOT get 
shut down!  They don't earn the $191.000/yr they get when congress is in 
session and "functioning", so why deny them when the government is shut 
down?

Phil Spelt, KCRC Emeritus, Past President
AMA 1294 Scientific Leader Member
SPA L-18, Board Member
(865)435-1476v, (865)604-0541c


On 9/30/2013 11:53 AM, Dave Burton wrote:
>
> I'm having trouble seeing the downside of a Govt. shutdown. Perhaps 
> they would run all essential stuff and shut down the non essential stuff!
>
> Naaah, that wouldn't happen, probably the other way around.
>
> *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] *On Behalf Of 
> *Ronald Van Putte
> *Sent:* Monday, September 30, 2013 10:08 AM
> *To:* General pattern discussion
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] nsrca shutdown???
>
> No, the downwind turn is easier to understand and makes more sense.
>
> BTW, all those in favor of having the salaries of all members of 
> Congress and their staffs suspended until they get the job done, say, 
> "Aye".
>
> Ron
>
> On Sep 30, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Randy Forbus wrote:
>
>
>
> Is this the same as the government shut down?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: vanputter at gmail.com <mailto:vanputter at gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:53:23 -0500
> To: mups1953 at yahoo.com <mailto:mups1953 at yahoo.com>; 
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] nsrca shutdown???
>
> Or the downwind turn.
>
> Ron
>
> On Sep 30, 2013, at 8:56 AM, mike mueller wrote:
>
>     What we need is a discussion on snap rolls. That'll wake everyone
>     up. Mike
>
>     Mike Mueller
>
>     Customer Services
>
>      F3AUnlimited
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     *From:* Gordon Seeling <gseeling at q.com <mailto:gseeling at q.com>>
>     *To:* nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>     <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>     *Sent:* Monday, September 30, 2013 6:59 AM
>     *Subject:* [NSRCA-discussion] nsrca shutdown???
>
>
>     toooo quiet!!!
>     _______________________________________________
>     NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>     NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>     <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>     http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>     NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>     <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>     http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion 
> mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130930/f6853474/attachment.html>