[NSRCA-discussion] Electronic KFactor Question
Dansy44
dansy44 at gmail.com
Wed Oct 2 13:47:56 AKDT 2013
The way I do :))
Sent from Daniel iPad 2
> On Oct 2, 2013, at 17:34, Peter Vogel <vogel.peter at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> AirDisplay is your friend! No cables needed to read the KFactor on your Big screen! :-)
>
>
>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Scott McHarg <scmcharg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've just discussed this with Derek. We have decided to keep at least two years worth of the HD versions. We will keep more as we can and we will keep the regular versions available indefinitely. I hope y'all like these improvements we are continuing to make to better serve our community.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> PS - Stuart, now I'm going to have to hook the computer up to the 65" TV. If I get in trouble, I'm sending your email address to Jan!
>>
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Stuart Chale <schale1 at verizon.net> wrote:
>>> Looks even better on a 30" monitor :)
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 10/2/2013 5:05 PM, Scott McHarg wrote:
>>>> I've spoken to Derek about this and we believe that we do not have a disk limit. We will double-check. I think we will offer both versions from now on. I really like the way the High Def version looks on the 27" monitor. As far as downloading it goes, so far, it's about 50/50 today HD vs. normal res. Either way, if we can't keep both editions, I can delete the HD one after the current month. We will offer both. Thanks guys for your time.
>>>>
>>>> Scott
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Dansy44 <dansy44 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Thinking about new member and the fact that you guys are trying to go electronic only.....I would just update the server and keep the high resolution....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from Daniel iPad 2
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 2, 2013, at 16:00, Peter Vogel <vogel.peter at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> yeah, that works for me -- high res recent edition(s). Storage wise, you just get derek to occasionally reap the high res editions based on storage availability (or me if you want to have me help out with the web site occasionally )
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter+
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Bob Kane <getterflash at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> I like Joe's idea, make both available, but limit the high resolution to the current edition.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bob Kane
>>>>>>> getterflash at yahoo.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: Scott McHarg <scmcharg at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 11:33 AM
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Electronic KFactor Question
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a question for you if you download the electronic KFactor. The way I publish the electronic version is through Adobe InDesign and turn it in to a pdf. I can make the issue high quality so that you can zoom in and the pictures are nice and clear even at 400%. The problem, of course, is that with higher quality comes much higher file size. I know some of you view the issue on your iPad or smartphone and some may have a slower internet connection. The difference between the "regular" version (typically 5MB) and a high definition copy (could be 35MB) is substantial. What I'd like to know is if the high quality version is important to you. I have the October issue online now. There is the "normal" version that I've been making for some time now (5MB). I have placed a high quality version online as well for you but I"m not sure if it's feasible to produce both every month (specifically for disk space on our server). **MAKE SURE you know what version you are downloading. Remember R.T.F.S. (Read the flipping screen). I would like to know what our membership likes/wants especially since Jan is now producing the electronic issue in full color. I will also work with Derek to find out if we are on a specified disk size or have "unlimited" disk space through our hosting provider. If we are unlimited and enough folks want it, I can always just produce both and let y'all choose which one you want.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks in advance for letting me know,
>>>>>>> Scott
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Scott A. McHarg
>>>>>>> Sr. Systems Engineer - Infrastructure
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Director, Fixed Wing Flight Training
>>>>>> Santa Clara County Model Aircraft Skypark
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Scott A. McHarg
>>>> Sr. Systems Engineer - Infrastructure
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Scott A. McHarg
>> Sr. Systems Engineer - Infrastructure
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> --
> Director, Fixed Wing Flight Training
> Santa Clara County Model Aircraft Skypark
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20131002/4dd8eb09/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list